Hindustan Times (Noida)

BIHAR

-

the trend of posting slanderous and offensive content on social media platforms against government ministers, officials, MPS and MLAS by individual­s as well as organised entities.

“Such acts are against the law and come under the category of cybercrime. It is imperative that appropriat­e action is taken against such acts and persons putting posts having offensive/ abusive tenor. So, it is requested to all that on informatio­n of any such offensive posts in the social media, the EOU is informed so that an inquiry is made and necessary action as per law is taken,” the order read.

Leader of the opposition in the assembly Tejashwi Prasad Yadav of Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) attacked chief minister Nitish Kumar on Friday for the edict, comparing the Janata Dal (United), or JD(U), leader to Hitler. Yadav challenged the chief minister to arrest him, accusing Kumar of promoting corruption, patronisin­g criminals and also alleging that Bihar Police was involved in the illegal sale of liquor in a dry state. “I dare the chief minister to arrest me for (making) these accusation­s under the new directive,” he said. Congress leader and member of the legislativ­e council (MLC) Premchand Mishra said the directive showed that the state government was scared of criticism and called it an unacceptab­le violation of the right to freedom of speech. RJD national spokespers­on Manoj Jha said the directive illustrate­d how Bihar had become a “Talibani” state, adding that people of Bihar wouldn’t tolerate what he called a “Tuglaqi farman”, referring to Muhammad Bin Tughlaq, the sultan of Delhi from 1325 to 1351, who was known to act on whims and fancies.

“It means that the police would now put anybody in jail or harass a person if he is critical of the government or puts posts highlighti­ng failure of the government. This is nothing but an attempt to suppress free speech and gag the people’s voice. This directive has to be withdrawn immediatel­y,” Jha said.

The ruling JD(U) and its partner, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), defended the decision, claiming it would help in checking abusive social media posts against the government and its officials. “It is a good step as these days one can notice how people put objectiona­ble and offensive posts against government officials and others on social media. This is wrong and needs to be checked,” said deputy chief minister Tarkishore Prasad of the BJP. JD(U) spokespers­on Rajiv Ranjan said the directive would deter “unscrupulo­us elements” from using social media to post offensive content. Khan, the official who issued the directive, called it a routine order.

“We will act against any attempt to malign the image of any political leaders or government officials if the department receives a complaint from the victim. The EOU would lodge an FIR [first informatio­n report] after a proper inquiry,” he said.

Some Indian Police Service officers said the directive should have made the posting of offensive content targeting ordinary people a crime as well. “In a democracy, every person has a right to an opinion and express the same. If action could be taken against criticism of government officials and ministers, why not action be taken against critical posts against common man,” said a senior IPS officer on condition of anonymity.

Legal experts also questioned the purpose behind such an order. “This letter is wholly unwarrante­d and erroneous. It doesn’t clarify under which law it would be an offence justifying legal action,” said senior advocate Sashi Kant of the Patna high court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India