Hindustan Times (Noida)

SC stays HC order directing schools to give free gadgets to poor students

THE DELHI GOVT AND CENTRE HAD CHALLENGED THE HC’S DECISION BEFORE THE APEX COURT

- Abraham Thomas abraham.thomas@htlive.com

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Wednesday stayed a Delhi high court verdict which directed private unaided as well as government schools like Kendriya Vidyalayas to provide gadgets and internet packages to students from economical­ly weaker sections (EWS) or disadvanta­ged groups so that they have access to online classes.

The high court decision of September 18, 2020, was challenged by the Delhi government and the Central government before the Supreme Court.

A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde agreed to hear the plea filed by the Delhi government.

On Wednesday, issuing notice to the NGO Justice For All, on the two pleas, a threejudge bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde said, “In the meantime, there shall be a stay on the operation of the impugned order of the high court.”

The high court order had come on a PIL filed by Justice for All.

The petitioner had prayed that a free laptop or mobile phone with high-speed internet be provided to students of Ews/disadvanta­ged groups who could not attend the virtual classes for want of these gadgets, unlike their well-off counterpar­ts.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, who appeared for the Delhi government, told the apex court that the government was already reeling under a fiscal stress created by the pandemic. The high court decision added to that burden, Singh said. He also pointed out that the order required to be stayed as private, unaided schools were given the freedom to recover the amount spent from the Delhi government.

The Supreme Court bench, also comprising justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubram­anian, said, “We realise that it will be an additional burden.”

In its September order, the high court said , “Elementary education is now a fundamenta­l human right as well as an enabling right and, every child, irrespecti­ve of his/her financial status is guaranteed the right to free and compulsory education.”

It also directed private unaided schools and government schools such as the Kendriya Vidyalayas to supply gadgets or equipment of optimum configurat­ion as well as internet packages to EWS/DG students to enable them access online classes.

The order noted that Section 8(d) of the RTE Act put an obligation on the state to provide infrastruc­ture, including learning equipment, to children. Additional­ly, the high court also held that the digital equipment should be provided free of cost to students and the cost for the same would be reimbursed by the state in accordance with Section 12(2) of the RTE Act.

Terming the divide created among students by the lack of digital equipment as “digital apartheid”, the HC even went on to advise the Central government to seriously consider investing in digital literacy and infrastruc­ture and to increase its education budget from the current spend of 4.43% of the gross domestic product (GDP).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India