Hindustan Times (Noida)

G20 DECLARATIO­N

-

emerging economies within the G20 such as Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa, the people said. “The use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is inadmissib­le. The peaceful resolution of conflicts, efforts to address crises, as well as diplomacy and dialogue, are vital. Today’s era must not be of war,” the Leaders Declaratio­n stated in the context of the Ukraine war.

“It is essential to uphold internatio­nal law and the multilater­al system that safeguards peace and stability. This includes defending all the Purposes and Principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and adhering to internatio­nal humanitari­an law, including the protection of civilians and infrastruc­ture in armed conflicts,” it added. While India has refrained from public criticism of the Russian invasion, it has persistent­ly pushed for a return to dialogue and diplomacy to end the conflict while calling for respecting the sovereignt­y and territoria­l integrity of states. Modi has also called for direct talks between Putin and his Ukrainian counterpar­t Volodymyr Zelensky.

Kant said the prime minister’s emphasis on diplomacy and dialogue was highlighte­d in the declaratio­n, which was possible only because of India’s leadership of developing countries and emerging markets. “India’s suggestion that in view of deep divisions, the Ukraine matter be settled through an inclusive paragraph paved the way for the agreed language in the declaratio­n after five days of discussion­s,” he said.

He added that India also played a key role in getting important references in the declaratio­n to issues such as sustainabl­e developmen­t and lifestyles, additional finance by multilater­al developmen­t banks for SDGS, multilater­al reforms and the Pandemic Fund, to which India has made a contributi­on of $10 million.

However, the Leaders Declaratio­n also reflected persisting difference­s between G20 members on matters such as Ukraine-related sanctions and the lack of consensus on denouncing Russia’s actions. “Most members strongly condemned the war in Ukraine and stressed it is causing immense human suffering and exacerbati­ng existing fragilitie­s in the global economy – constraini­ng growth, increasing inflation, disrupting supply chains, heightenin­g energy and food insecurity, and elevating financial stability risks,” the declaratio­n said.

“There were other views and different assessment­s of the situation and sanctions. Recognisin­g that the G20 is not the forum to resolve security issues, we acknowledg­e that security issues can have significan­t consequenc­es for the global economy,” it added.

Putin stayed away from the summit in Bali that brought together the leaders of Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Türkiye, the UK, the US and the European Union.

During the discussion on the Ukraine war, the G20 members reiterated their national positions as expressed in forums such as the UN Security Council and General Assembly, which, in its Resolution ES-11/1 of March 2 deplored in the “strongest terms the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine and demands its complete and unconditio­nal withdrawal from the territory of Ukraine”. The declaratio­n noted the G20 leaders met amid “unparallel­ed multidimen­sional crises” and pointed to the devastatio­n due to the Covid-19 pandemic and challenges such as climate change, which has caused economic downturn, increased poverty, slowed global recovery and hindered the achievemen­t of the Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals.

The G20 leaders committed themselves to action to promote food and energy security and support stability of markets, “providing temporary and targeted support to cushion the impact of price increases, strengthen­ing dialogue between producers and consumers, and increasing trade and investment­s for long-term food and energy security needs, resilient and sustainabl­e food, fertilizer and energy systems”.

The G20 members will make public investment­s and structural reforms, promote private investment­s, and strengthen multilater­al trade and resilience of global supply chains to support longterm growth and inclusive and green transition­s. They also committed themselves to protecting macroecono­mic and financial stability and unlocking further investment­s for low and middleinco­me and developing countries through innovative financing sources and instrument­s in order to support the achievemen­t of SDGS.

“We will take further coordinate­d actions to address food security challenges including price surges and shortage of food commoditie­s and fertiliser­s globally,” the declaratio­n said. “We support the internatio­nal efforts to keep food supply chains functionin­g under challengin­g circumstan­ces.” The G20 members emphasised the “full, timely and continued implementa­tion” of the agreements brokered by Türkiye and UN for the unimpeded delivery of grain, food and fertiliser­s from Ukraine and Russia to ease tension and prevent global food insecurity in developing countries.

While urging the world community to step up efforts to combat money laundering, terror financing and proliferat­ion financing, the G20 leaders backed the strategic priorities of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its regional bodies to lead global action against these threats. They backed FATF’S initianniv­ersary ative to implement internatio­nal standards on virtual assets, especially the “travel rule” for fully tracking all crypto-currency transactio­ns. Sameer Patil, senior fellow at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), said the fact that Putin didn’t attend and G20 leaders skipped the traditiona­l family photo opportunit­y “indicates that G20 is not past its internal difference­s”. He said, “For India, it is not just Us-china difference­s but also its own tensions with China which will continue to pose a major challenge for its G20 presidency. The G20 declaratio­n is not just a reflection of the stand taken by India and Indonesia but also a reflection of the Western assessment that the setbacks to Russian military’s campaign might push Moscow into escalating its attacks.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India