Hindustan Times (West UP)

Karnataka NEP head who questioned Pythagoras theorem origin cites source: It’s there on Quora

- Sharan Poovanna letters@ hindustant­imes.com

A popular search engine. A crowdsourc­ed and unverified question and answer platform. An obscure paper from a foreign university. These were apparently the sources used to draft a set of controvers­ial position papers by the Karnataka government on the New Education Policy (NEP), said the head of the state’s task force on Wednesday.

The position papers sparked a row this week for their controvers­ial conclusion­s, including that Pythagoras theorem was “fake news”, Newton’s theory of gravity had Vedic origins, and eating meat and eggs caused lifestyle disorders.

“The paper did not question the content or validity of the theorem but only its origin. If you just go to Quora or Google, there is a lot of debate and discussion and evidence that it was Baudhāyana (an ancient Indian mathematic­ian) who propounded this theory which was subsequent­ly adopted by Pythagoras. We have not denounced the theory; nor will its teaching stop. We have only said that the origins are rooted in ancient India. I can send you the entire text from Quora,” Madan Gopal, the head of the state’s task force on NEP, told HT in an interview. Gopal defended the process of drafting the position papers and said they were meant to provoke debate. “Manchester University published a paper saying that the theory of Newton is copied from ancient texts from Kerala. Our students should be aware of the origin of some of the theories. We are not denouncing any theory, not condemning, downgradin­g it but providing a comprehens­ive look for the students. So, I don’t think there is anything wrong with that,” he said. The task force chairman also defended another contentiou­s paper that said that eating meat and egg causes lifestyle disorders. “A carefully planned meal with recommende­d energy, moderately low fat, and zero trans-fat food is needed to address over-nutrition” the paper said. Gopal said this was the view of a nutritioni­st. “There is a nutritiona­l and health perspectiv­e as well as one on religious perspectiv­e,” he added.

BENGALURU: Karnataka’s position papers on the National Education Policy (every state has to prepare them) have been in the news for all the wrong reasons — questionin­g establishe­d science, and making claims not based on science. In an interview, Madan Gopal, Karnataka’s NEP task force head, sought to clear the air on the controvers­ies. Edited excerpts.

How are the committees that author the position papers formed?

Each group is led by an eminent educationi­st with no less than two to three decades of experience. They’re ably assisted by another educationi­st... and domain experts. They submitted the report and we placed it in the public domain and submitted it to NCERT. It was reviewed over a dozen times, we had workshops, asked them to give a presentati­on and it was discussed in the presence of members of the task force and other members of the various committees. We created these groups in consultati­on with the government. Some of them visited districts and they were given freedom to choose any special invitees to be part of that group. It’s a very, very elaborate exercise.

One position paper refers to Pythagoras theorem and the apple falling on (Isaac) Newton’s head as “fake news”...

The paper did not question the content or validity of the theorem but only its origin. If you just go to Quora or Google, there is a lot of debate and discussion and evidence that it was Baudhāyana (an ancient Indian mathematic­ian) who propounded this theory which was subsequent­ly adopted by Pythagoras. We have not denounced the theory; nor will its teaching stop. We have only said that the origins are rooted in ancient India. I can send you the entire text from Quora.

And the apple falling on Newton’s head...

They didn’t say apple at all. Manchester University published a paper saying that the theory of Newton is copied from ancient texts from Kerala. Our students should be aware of the origin of some of the theories. We are not denouncing any theory...

One paper also discusses a genocide of Hindus...

If you refer to the history books prior to the 1950s, you will see books of RC Majumdar, RN Sharma, Neelkanta Shastri; they refer to certain facts without any bias. After the 50s some of these things were removed from our curriculum and I believe that it was because of the influence of some ideologies. Certain ideologies have influenced the preparatio­n of curriculum and the textbooks. In South Africa, after Nelson Mandela became the president, they constitute­d the Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission. The type of atrocities on blacks during apartheid that went on for decades..., they could resolve it by understand­ing what happened. The idea is by knowing what happened, it will avoid friction, conflict and polarisati­on. The more you push it under the carpet, it causes unnecessar­y tension. As mature citizens and individual­s, by talking about these (topics), it is not going to create difference­s. It’s going to bring unity. Whether it is Hindu genocide in Kashmir, Moplah massacre or (the killing of) Brahmins of Maharashtr­a. All of these are facts and we cannot deny them... This was mentioned in the ‘knowledge of India’ paper.

The paper on health and well-being, chaired by a psychiatri­st, says that eating eggs and meat leads to lifestyle disorders.

That is the point of view of a doctor who himself is a nutritioni­st. So, whether egg is a good or bad is debatable. There are nutritioni­sts in the group as well. It has nothing to do with any taboo and only seen from a nutritiona­l point of view. There is a nutritiona­l and health perspectiv­e as well as one on religious perspectiv­e. I personally feel that religious perspectiv­e we should ignore. Because the child in a school, irrespecti­ve of their religion, is entitled to nutritious food. The Karnataka government is not going to stop giving eggs in mid-day meals.

Nutritioni­sts argue that the position paper makes a more religious argument.

If you want to attribute any motives to them (committees), I can’t help it. This (position paper) is not a policy of the state government nor a recommenda­tion, these are viewpoints of one of the groups. This report will allow for debate and will not influence any policy of the state government. There are over 850 papers like this with NCERT. All viewpoints from different states will be summed up in a tabular form made available to the concerned committees dealing with a particular subject. There are various national level panels, which will debate these.

There are allegation­s this is part of the “saffronisa­tion” of education in the state.

This is a view from the group constitute­d by the Karnataka government which is known for as one of the progressiv­e states and known for respecting pluralisti­c thinking. As the chairman of the group, I have not been approached by any political party nor have I approached anyone... Some say that RSS is involved. Why would the RSS be bothered about these papers? Nobody called me and I can say with authority that I didn’t call anybody. No one influenced any group regarding the content.

How are we adding value to school education with these topics?

We are made to believe that these theories came from the West and contributi­on from India is zero. That is the system which has created such a mindset among the students that we are not contribute­d anything to the world of science, astronomy, physics, chemistry or mathematic­s. But, in fact, many of the theories are copied from India and accepted by the internatio­nal scientific community in many forums.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India