Hindustan Times (West UP)

G20: India’s developmen­t model can lead the way

- Malancha Chakrabart­y Malancha Chakrabart­y is senior fellow and deputy director (Research), Observer Research Foundation The views expressed are personal

India has repeatedly been dubbed as an emerging donor in the internatio­nal developmen­t literature, but the country has a long history of developmen­t cooperatio­n. As a newly independen­t country with monumental challenges, India recognised its internatio­nal responsibi­lity and was keen to share its developmen­t experience. India announced 70 scholarshi­ps for students from Asia and Africa to study in India in 1949, and the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperatio­n (ITEC) was launched in 1964. The founding principles of India’s developmen­t cooperatio­n were anti-colonialis­m, third-world solidarity, and sharing of developmen­t experience. These principles were of great normative significan­ce because the internatio­nal aid architectu­re was heavily dominated by the West, whose developmen­t model often deepened existing inequaliti­es among countries and created dependenci­es. However, given India’s dependence on foreign aid at the time, these programmes received little attention.

Things changed dramatical­ly in the early 2000s when India substantia­lly expanded its developmen­t cooperatio­n programme on the back of high-growth rates in the post-liberalisa­tion era. The India Developmen­t and Economic Assistance Scheme was launched in 2003, under which Delhi extended concession­al credit lines to developing countries for projects such as energy transmissi­on lines, roads, power plants and irrigation systems. So far, India has approved credit lines worth $27.7 billion to developing countries in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.

The ITEC programme was also expanded significan­tly, and its budget is now estimated at Rs 220 crore. Currently, about 98 Indian institutio­ns offer courses in agricultur­e, engineerin­g and technology, the climate crisis and environmen­t, food and fertiliser, and Artificial Intelligen­ce to participan­ts from 160 partner countries. In addition, the e-Vidhya Bharati and Arogya Bharati were launched in 2018 to provide free tele-education and continuing medical education to 4,000 African students and 1,000 African medical profession­als every year for the next five years.

A key feature of India’s developmen­t cooperatio­n is its ability to provide low-cost developmen­t solutions. For instance, under the Solar Mama programme, illiterate women are trained to become solar engineers and electrify villages in remote districts. So far, over 800 solar mamas from 78 countries have been trained and they have electrifie­d 50,000 homes in 500 villages. On the other hand, much of the aid provided by western countries such as the United

States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Denmark is recycled back to their countries because their administra­tive costs are high, and they hire expensive consultant­s who are often out of touch with the real developmen­t challenges of poor countries. The cost of Indian goods and services is lower than that of developed countries, so more goods and services can be provided with one dollar in India. Therefore, India’s developmen­t cooperatio­n budget is much higher in purchasing power parity terms.

India’s approach to developmen­t cooperatio­n has several other advantages. Unlike the Organisati­on for Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t, India does not have a prescripti­ve donor-recipient relationsh­ip with its partners. Instead, India’s developmen­t initiative­s are demand-driven, meaning the recipient country identifies the project based on its needs and priorities. Because of the principles of mutual benefit, no conditions and respect for sovereignt­y, India is often bracketed with China in the literature on internatio­nal developmen­t cooperatio­n. However, there are significan­t difference­s. Chinese developmen­t cooperatio­n is typically characteri­sed by large State-led infrastruc­ture projects, often using natural resources as collateral. In addition, China is severely criticised for the unsustaina­bility of its loans and its poor record in local employment generation, and maintainin­g environmen­tal and labour standards. India is not facing a backlash on any of these fronts.

Moreover, India’s developmen­t initiative­s are closely related to the Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals (SDGs), although it does not explicitly mention the achievemen­t of SDGs as the objective of its developmen­t cooperatio­n.

As India assumes the G20 presidency in December, it should aspire to play a more significan­t role in internatio­nal developmen­t and call for a greater initiative in implementi­ng SDGs. Given the massive challenges that the world is facing due to the after-effects of the pandemic and the ongoing Ukraine-Russia war, India must use the G20 platform to shift the focus of attention back to developmen­t and showcase its developmen­t model globally, as it offers significan­t advantages over other models. The current challenges demand a new thrust in internatio­nal developmen­t cooperatio­n and new ways of working from all developmen­t actors. The Indian model has a lot to offer.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India