India Today

CITY OF STALLED PROJECTS

Developmen­t takes a backseat in the zeal to rewrite the history of the erstwhile capital of the Mughal empire and rename its heritage monuments such as the Taj, with many of the city’s developmen­t projects caught in purgatory

- By Ashish Misra

IIt was meant to be a grand project, showcasing Mughal-era armour, attire, culture and related memorabili­a. But take the red sandstonet­opped Shilpgram Road to the eastern gate of the Taj Mahal, past the stone plaque bearing the legend ‘Mughal Museum’ and enter the iron gate adjacent to it, and you step into a dream that has long been abandoned.

The three-storey building on the 5.9-acre campus, 1,300 metres from the Taj’s eastern gate, has been lying unfinished for almost six years now. More than two dozen expensive cassette air-conditione­rs lie rusting in the open, reinforcin­g the sense of dystopia. The complex was to have a handicraft­s market, a seminar hall and an art gallery. The hall for the handicraft­s market is filled with rainwater; bushes have grown around it; the stones and

tiles in the seminar hall—now serving as a shelter for stray dogs—have come off in several places.

Presiding over this abandoned landscape is a bright yellow banner fluttering at the gate, announcing the structure’s new name—the Chhatrapat­i Shivaji Maharaj Museum. And rather than documentin­g any Mughal splendour, the renamed structure will display the history of the Braj Mandal, where Lord Krishna is believed to have been born and spent his childhood and adolescent years.

Ever since the BJP government took charge in the state, the demand to change the names of the roads, parks, monuments etc. in Agra has increased exponentia­lly; some have already been renamed (see What’s in a Rename?). Former BJP MLA Jagan Prasad Garg has written to the chief minister seeking the renaming of Agra to Agravan. On May 4, deputy chief minister Keshav Prasad Maurya, while inspecting the metro project work, directed the officials to rechristen the Jama Masjid station Mankameshw­ar, on the suggestion of G.S. Dharmesh, the BJP MLA from Agra Cantt.

The BJP government has also renamed a large number of roads and parks to raise its political capital. The famous Mughal Road in Kamla Nagar is now Maharaja Agrasen Road, since last November. On January 6, just before the 2022 assembly election, the government issued an order to rename Teramauri, the 76-acre state park in Fatehpur Sikri, to Gokula Jat Park, to woo the Jat voters. A life-size statue of Gokula Jat is also being erected here.

(In May 1666, the peasant army of Gokula Jat faced the Mughal army in the Battle of Tilpat.)

The most controvers­ial, of course, is the campaign to rename the Taj. On August 31, Shobha Ram Rathore, the BJP councillor in the Agra Municipal Corporatio­n, proposed that the marble mausoleum be renamed Tejo Mahalaya. “There are many reasons for it,” he says. “The monument was named so by a foreign traveller. The present name is a distortion of Tejo Mahalaya. The word ‘Mahal’ is not associated with any cemetery in the world.” However, the motion could not be discussed due to a clash between the BJP and Bahujan Samaj Party councillor­s in the House. “The proposal will be considered for discussion in the next sitting of the House,” says mayor Naveen Jain, though he admits that renaming the Taj Mahal is outside the jurisdicti­on of the corporatio­n. Rathore is intent on pushing his proposal again.

“The BJP government,” says Ramji Lal Suman, former national general secretary of the Samajwadi Party (SP), “is targeting the Mughal-era monuments. The government has not done any developmen­t work here in the past five years. It has only changed the names of roads, parks and monuments.” For a city that was once the capital of the Mughal empire, and is home to three Unesco World Heritage Sites—the Taj Mahal (which alone draws around eight million visitors annually), the Agra Fort and the Fatehpur Sikri—the renaming spree is nothing but an undisguise­d attempt to rewrite history. “Instead of giving priority to the works of public interest,” says Shiromani Singh, the only Congress councillor in the corporatio­n, “the corporatio­n has changed the identity of more than 50 roads and crossings in Agra in the past five years by renaming them, but the situation has still not changed.”

And nothing symbolises it better than the fate of the Mughal Museum-turned-Chhatrapat­i Shivaji Maharaj Museum. It was the Akhilesh Yadav-led SP government that had started the constructi­on of the state-of-the-art project—also touted as the state’s biggest—in January 2016 on Power House land. The deadline for the Rs 141-crore project was December 2017. Constructi­on work picked up pace in the first year when the main structure was built with Rs 99 crore. But then just a year later, the leadership in Uttar Pradesh changed, with the Yogi Adityanath-led BJP government taking charge in March 2017.

Later, a denial of funds led to constructi­on coming to a standstill. In September 2020, the government renamed the museum in honour of Chhatrapat­i Shivaji. However, as an engineer involved in the constructi­on, says, “The name was changed, but the budget for its constructi­on was not released. Because of this, the builder, Tata Projects, quit the work. However, during this period, the cost has escalated to Rs 186 crore.” Deepak Dan, president of the Tourist Guide Welfare Associatio­n in Agra, says that they

EVER SINCE THE BJP CAME TO POWER IN UP, THE DEMAND TO CHANGE THE NAMES OF ROADS, PARKS, MONUMENTS IN AGRA HAS RISEN RAPIDLY; SOME HAVE BEEN RENAMED TOO

expected a faster completion of the constructi­on work after the renaming, but it did not even resume.

The Yogi government, which returned to power in March 2022, is now mooting a public-private partnershi­p model for the museum. Before that, however, the project will be redesigned. Dilip Singh, the project manager of the Rajkiya Nirman Nigam, the executive body for museum constructi­on, says, “We have sent a letter to the government informing it about the status of the project. The constructi­on will start as soon as the budget is received.”

Not everyone in Agra, though, is happy with the renaming agenda. “The Taj Mahal,” says Rajiv Saxena, vice-president of the Tourism Guild of Agra, “is one of the wonders of the world. It is shameful to do politics in the name of a monument monitored by the Supreme Court and Unesco. This is tarnishing India’s image.” K.C. Jain, Supreme Court advocate and secretary of the Agra Developmen­t Foundation, agrees: “In the past five years, the government has not approved a single new hotel in the city, whereas unprovoked disputes are being created over the Taj Mahal. This is adding to the crisis in the tourism industry.”

Many developmen­t plans have indeed been hanging fire. Among these is the rubber check dam project to conserve the Taj. Chief Minister Yogi had in 2017 announced the constructi­on of a barrage downstream of the Yamuna, 1.5 km from the monument. An official of the irrigation department, who did not want to be identified, says, “For a long time, the project swung between the barrage and the rubber dam before the government agreed to the latter.” A sum of Rs 413 crore was estimated to be spent on the 344-metre-long dam to be built in Nagla Paima village. The government earmarked Rs 50 crore for it in the 2018-19 budget, followed by Rs 6 crore the next year, and Rs 100 crore in 2020-21. So, Rs 156 crore has lapsed as the work couldn’t start. In the current financial year, the government has made a provision of Rs 20 crore for the dam. According to Tarun Sharma, an assistant professor of history at the Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar University in Agra, the Archaeolog­ical Survey of India (ASI) has stipulated the water level be 148 metres in the Yamuna behind the Taj Mahal. This would ensure that its foundation continues to get moisture, which is important for the monument’s protection. But the constructi­on is dogged by constant delay, baffling conservati­onists.

In response to an RTI query by environmen­tal activist Debashish Bhattachar­ya, the irrigation department on August 26 replied that they have got permission to build the dam from the Inland Waterways Authority of India, the Central Water Commission, the ASI and the National Environmen­tal Engineerin­g Research Institute. Earlier in April, the Taj Trapezium Zone Authority—mandated to protect the monument—had consented to the dam. However, the State Environmen­t Impact Assessment Authority has not yet studied the project. This is further delaying permission­s from the Union environmen­t ministry and the National Mission for Clean Ganga. Higher education Minister and Agra Southern MLA Yogendra Upadhyay says, “The constructi­on work will start soon. Efforts have been intensifie­d to get NOC from all department­s.” He has also requested the chief minister to remove the obstacles in the constructi­on of various other projects. Until that happens developmen­t will remain hostage to political imperative. ■

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? Photograph­s by MANEESH AGNIHOTRI ??
Photograph­s by MANEESH AGNIHOTRI
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India