Millennium Post (Kolkata)

An enabling redefiniti­on

A fresh definition of ‘retrenchme­nt’ through modificati­on in Indian labour laws is required to safeguard the interests of workers, including the ‘divinely abled’ ones

- RAAVI BIRBAL The writer is a practising Advocate in Supreme Court and High Court of Delhi. Views expressed are personal

While the employment laws of India are generally known to be pro-employees, they are actually age-old, anti-economy, and full of exorbitant compliance­s. Additional­ly, they have a narrow and completely unbalanced approach. For instance, a factory, mine, or plantation, even if running into huge losses, is required to obtain prior permission from authoritie­s to close down if there is a workforce of a hundred or more workers. This permission is given only in the rarest of rare cases. A militant union leader, even if creating a ruckus in an establishm­ent, normally has to be dismissed after a disciplina­ry inquiry consisting of elaborate procedures. But ironically, if a worker is continuous­ly ill, in many circumstan­ces, he can be validly terminated without any legal complicati­ons as his terminatio­n is excluded from the purview of retrenchme­nt laws.

In fact, even if a worker gets amputated while working in a factory, the only remedy available to him is petty compensati­on under the Employee Compensati­on Act or peanut benefits under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. The Rights of Persons with Disabiliti­es Act, 2016 (PWD) enlarged the scope of the previous Act of 1995, especially with respect to the kind of disabiliti­es, social and economic rights, accessible infrastruc­ture, transporta­tion, communicat­ion, technologi­es,

Divinely abled individual­s often put in more effort than anyone else and tend to be loyal to their organisati­on

rehabilita­tions, conditions of services, better participat­ion, etc. The PWD Act mandates equal access to education and employment for persons with disabiliti­es. The amended Act also covers private establishm­ents to a large extent but does not explicitly protect its employees from terminatio­n, as in the government sector or grant any excess compensati­on.

An amendment in the Industrial Disputes Act is a possible solution to fill in the gap, especially in the definition of retrenchme­nt. Modificati­on of Section 2(oo) defining ‘retrenchme­nt,’ which excludes terminatio­n on grounds of continuous ill-health in its clause (c), is needed. Undoubtedl­y, while framing or amending such legislatio­n in a country like ours, one cannot be too large-hearted and has to be pragmatic. A balanced approach is needed. Distinctiv­e provisions can be made based on the size of such business entities. For instance, while it may not be fair to burden small-level companies with compulsion­s, sizable ones can be imposed with certain restrictio­ns in cases of employees becoming indisposed for longer durations. Similarly, a re-look at the Employee Compensati­on Act as well as the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 is needed. There should be a mandatory provision for insurance and better premiums.

At the same time, the misuse of benevolent provisions by employees in government sectors also needs to be checked. Over-extended leaves under the garb of the Disabiliti­es Act, based on fake medical documents, need thorough scrutiny. Similarly, committing misconduct and then claiming protection of employment also needs to be dealt with caution, as a series of judgments have already held.

Basic human rights are fundamenta­l to every individual’s existence and an indispensa­ble obligation for the country’s administra­tion. The Constituti­on of India secures to the citizens, including the divinely abled (disabled), the right to justice, liberty, equality of status, and opportunit­y, among other things. Needless to say, this cannot be achieved unless other laws are made in consonance. The United National Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabiliti­es (UNCRPD), an internatio­nal document, has been framed to protect the human rights and dignity of persons with disabiliti­es.

Furthermor­e, when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibi­lity, one of the noblest endeavours that corporates can undertake is to invest in the careers of divinely abled individual­s and provide specialise­d training, especially in the technology sector. A life of dignity is of utmost importance. Divinely abled individual­s often put in more effort than anyone else and tend to be loyal to organizati­ons. This would also lead to a lower attrition rate, although currently it is the highest in this sector, creating multiple challenges for HR. In fact, such foundation­s can also cater to one of the most pertinent needs of our country, i.e., a technologi­cally advanced workforce.

With the modificati­on and addition of certain laws, apart from the full implementa­tion of existing legislatio­n, much can be achieved. A country is known by the way it treats divinely abled people. Not only should they be provided with basic human rights and equality in every opportunit­y, but the benefits should be such that they experience life as a celebratio­n.

 ?? ?? A country is recognised by the way it treats its ‘divinely abled’ population
A country is recognised by the way it treats its ‘divinely abled’ population
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India