EC showcauses
Ghosh and other BJP members/candidates from making or spreading such “personal objectionable/disrespectful remarks” against Mamata Banerjee and any other members/candidates of the party. It had demanded immediate action against him for “blatant violation of the MCC” and making such distorted and disrespectful statements against the Chief Minister of West Bengal.
Meanwhile, sources said that the BJP, on Wednesday, sent a show-cause notice to Dilip Ghosh for his remarks against Banerjee.
Ghosh is learnt to have issued an apology where he regretted his choice of words but alleged that even the TMC made derogatory remarks against state BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari and his father Sisir Adhikari.
HC denies interim relief
the application for interim relief, with a return date of April 3, 2024. The court ordered the ED to ensure that responses are filed to the main petition and the application for Kejriwal’s interim release by April 2, 2024.
Kejriwal, who was arrested on March 21 and subsequently remanded to the ED’s custody until March 28 by a Delhi court, sought immediate release on the grounds that his arrest was unlawful. Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, representing the ED, stated that the “voluminous” petition was only served to them on
Tuesday, and they should be given time to record their stance.
During the hearing, Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, stated that the coercive action was based on the uncorroborated statements of co-accused-turned-approvers, Raghav Magunta and P Sarath Chandra Reddy. He pointed out several “glaring issues” that required the high court’s immediate decision.
Justice Sharma noted that it would be unfair not to allow the ED an opportunity to counter the petitioner’s stance by filing a detailed response, especially when the relief sought in the main petition and the interim application, i.e., his release, is similar and identical.
The court observed that the ED may have some “additional material”, gathered during the custodial interrogation of the petitioner, which may be crucial in deciding the current case. Therefore, the court rejected Singhvi’s argument that the respondent is not required to file a response.
The court also stated that any order releasing the petitioner from custody would amount to granting the petitioner bail or interim bail as an interim measure, and its writ jurisdiction is not a “ready substitute” for a bail application.
Singhvi contended the arrest of a sitting chief minister on the cusp of elections after a model code of conduct had come into force was against the basic structure and the concept of a “level playing field” for polls.
He alleged that the arrest was without any “necessity”, as mandated under the provisions of PMLA.
“Object of the arrest was not to find material but to disable me and my party politically. My prayer is, release me now”, he argued.
“Of course, a sitting CM can be arrested. The question is the timing,” Singhvi added.
The senior lawyer also argued
that any “non-cooperation” cannot become a ground for arrest, adding, “Non-cooperation is the most abused phrase since ED got hyperactive”.
Singhvi also claimed that exculpatory statements in favour of the accused were suppressed by the agency which was making a “mockery of fair process”.
He also alleged that the agency’s request for time to file a response was motivated and a delay tactic.
“Democracy itself is involved. Basic structure is involved. Level playing field is involved. Even an hour spent in custody is far too long if arrest is illegal,” Singhvi said.
He further said that the vicarious liability cannot be imposed on Kejriwal for any alleged violation of PMLA by his party.
The case pertains to the alleged corruption and money laundering in the formulation and implementation of the Delhi government’s excise policy for 202122, which was later scrapped.
MVA rift out
Shinde-led Sena. The party also named Narendra Khedekar as its candidate from Buldhana, Sanjay Deshmukh from YavatmalWashim, Sanjog Waghere-Patil from Maval, Rajabhau Waje from Nashik, Bhausaheb Wakchaure from Shirdi and Nagesh Patil Ashtikar from Hingoli.
Another MVA ally, NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) is yet to officially declare its candidates for the April-May Lok Sabha polls. On the other hand, the Congress, which is also a part of the statelevel grouping of the opposition parties, has declared its candidates on some seats where there is no tussle with its alliance partners.
Maharashtra, which has 48
Lok Sabha seats, the second highest after Uttar Pradesh (80), will vote in five phases starting from
April 19. The senior Congress leader also lamented that Ambedkar had announced a separate list of candidates.
“Considering the prevailing political situation in the country, the Congress made a genuine attempt to reach out to all parties who believe in democracy and the Constitution,” he said.
Addressing a press conference here, B R Ambedkar’s grandson, who himself will contest from Akola, accused MVA allies of trying to use his outfit to promote dynastic politics, which he asserted, his party is trying to resist.
The VBA has fielded Sanjay Kewat from Bhandara-Gondiya, Hitesh Madavi from Gadchiroli, Rajesh Belle from Chandrapur, Vasant Magar from Buldhana, Ambedkar from Akola, Prakajkta Pillewan from Amravati, Rajendra Salunkhe from Wardha and Khemsingh Pawar from Yavatmal-Washim.
MVA constituents Congress, Sena (UBT) and NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar) have been holding seat-sharing discussions for the 48 constituencies in Maharashtra, where the Lok Sabha polls will be held in five phases starting April 19.
internal affairs of others. This responsibility is even more so in case of fellow democracies. It could otherwise end up setting unhealthy precedents,” the statement read.
“India’s legal processes are based on an independent judiciary which is committed to objective and timely outcomes. Casting aspersions on that is unwarranted”, it said.
The development on Wednesday came just days after the MEA had summoned the German deputy head of mission at the embassy, George Enzweilerk, here to lodge a strong protest against remarks by a foreign ministry’s spokesperson in Berlin who said that “like everyone facing accusations, Kejriwal is entitled to a fair and impartial trial.’’
“We see such remarks as interfering in our judicial process and undermining the independence of our judiciary,” the MEA had said.
PMLA can’t be applied
The court further explained that the legislative intent gathered from the definition of the scheduled offence under clause (y) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the PMLA is that every crime which may generate proceeds of crime need not be a scheduled offence. Therefore, only certain specific offences have been included in the schedule.
The bench stated that allowing criminal conspiracy to be a scheduled offence by itself, without any link to the scheduled offence included in the PMLA, would make the schedule “meaningless or redundant”. It added that only because there is a conspiracy to commit an offence, the same does not become an aggravated offence.
The bench held that it cannot be the legislature’s intention to make every offence not included in the schedule a scheduled offence by applying section 120B. Therefore, in their view, the offence under Section 120B of IPC included in Part A of the schedule will become a scheduled offence only if the criminal conspiracy is to commit any offence already included in Parts A, B or C of the Schedule.
The top court had pronounced
the verdict in November 2023 on an appeal against the Karnataka High Court order which had refused to quash the money laundering case against a woman, who was former vice-chancellor of Alliance University. The Enforcement Directorate had booked her under provisions of PMLA by invoking section 120B of IPC though the offences for which the accused was charged were not scheduled offences.
WITH AGENCY INPUTS World wastes
Brian Roe, a food waste researcher at Ohio State University, highlighted the importance of the index in addressing food waste. He noted that reducing food waste can lead to numerous benefits, including resource conservation, reduced environmental damage, improved food security, and more land available for uses other than landfills and food production.
The report indicated a significant increase in the coverage of food waste in low- and middleincome countries. However, the authors suggested that wealthier nations may need to take the lead in international cooperation and policy development to reduce food waste.
The report noted that many governments, regional and industry groups are utilising public-private partnerships to reduce food waste and its impact on climate and water stress. These partnerships involve collaboration between governments, municipalities, and businesses in the food supply chain, with businesses committing to measure food waste.
Food redistribution, including the donation of surplus food to food banks and charities, plays a crucial role in addressing food waste among retailers. One organisation involved in this effort is
Food Banking Kenya, a nonprofit that collects surplus food from farms, markets, supermarkets, and packing houses and distributes it to schoolchildren and vulnerable populations. In Kenya, where an estimated 4.45 million tons of food is wasted annually, food waste is a growing concern.
AGENCIES
222 Bills passed
MPs from Chhattisgarh had the highest average attendance, with 11 representatives attending 216 out of the 273 sessions. In contrast, Arunachal Pradesh had the lowest average attendance, with its two MPs attending only 127 sessions.
The report further explored engagement levels across states and political parties. Maharashtra MPs were the most active, with 49 representatives asking an average of 315 questions each. In comparison, MPs from Manipur asked an average of 25 questions each.
In terms of political parties, the NCP was notable with its five MPs asking an average of 410 questions each. Conversely, two MPs from Apna Dal (Soneylal) asked an average of only five questions each.
Members of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) attended an average of 229 out of the 273 sessions. In contrast, AAP members had the lowest attendance, averaging only 57 sessions.
The report also highlighted 10 MPs who were particularly active in parliamentary proceedings, asking the most questions. Topping this list was BJP’s Balurghat MP Sukanta Majumdar, who asked 596 questions.Most of the questions were centred around health and family welfare, agriculture and farmers welfare, and railways.
India objects to US comments