Millennium Post

SC scraps order allowing Rpower’s Sasan UMPP to ‘recover’ ₹1,050 cr

-

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricit­y (APTEL) which had allowed Reliance Powerpromo­ted Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project (UMPP) to recover Rs 1,050 crore alleged dues from procurer electricit­y distributi­on firms.

“We thus find that the Appellate Tribunal is wholly incorrect in accepting the case of waiver put forward by learned counsel for Sasan, and is equally incorrect in absolving the independen­t engineer for the test certificat­e given by him on March 30, 2013.

“We, therefore, set aside the Appellate Tribunal’s judgement, and reinstate the judgement dated August 8, 2014 of the Central Electricit­y Regulatory Commission,” a bench of justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman said.

UMPP, located in Singrauli district of Madhya Pradesh, is an integrated power plantcum-coal mining project at a single location, involving an investment of over Rs 27,000 crore.

The company was allowed by the APTEL to recover Rs 1,050 crore dues from procurer states’ companies.

The Appellate Tribunal for Electricit­y (APTEL) in its March 31 order had upheld the Sasan Power Ltd’s commercial operationa­l date (COD) claim that the first unit of 660 MW started its commercial operation on March 31, 2013 and directed procurers to pay Rs 1050 crore to the UMPP.

Besides All India Power Engineers Federation, power distributi­on companies such as Ajmer Vidyut Vitran distributi­on Nigam, MP Management Company, Haryana Power Generation Corporatio­n (now Haryana Power Purchase Centre), U.P Power Corporatio­n and Punjab State Power Corporatio­n had challenged the APTEL order which was in favour of Sasan UMPP.

The Tata Power Distributi­on Ltd, and Tata Power Delhi Distributi­on Ltd had also challenged the order of the tribunal.

The dispute pertained to the date from which Sasan project started commercial supply of power to the distributi­on firms.

While Sasan UMPP said the start date is March 31, 2013, the distributi­on firms claimed that it was August 16, 2013.

The Sasan UMPP had been claiming that the power distributi­on firms owed it Rs 1,050 crore as payment for the power supplies between March 31, 2013 and August 16, 2013.

The Central Electricit­y Regulatory Commission (CERC), on August 8, 2014, had held that the commercial operation date was August 16, 2013.

It had allowed the plea of power distributi­on companies that the electricit­y supplied between March 31, 2013 and August 16, 2013 was ‘infirm power’ or electricit­y injected into the grid prior to the start of commercial operations.

Sasan UMPP appealed against the CERC order before the APTEL which reversed the order and allowed the Reliance firm to recover Rs 1,050 crore alleged dues from procurer electricit­y distributi­on firms.

The power distributi­on companies then moved the Supreme Court against the APTEL order.

The apex court, in its 63-page verdict, said the public interest has to be kept in mind when the question of waiver, in favour of the generator of electricit­y, is considered.

“We have also pointed out that the Appellate Tribunal’s finding that the Independen­t Engineer’s test certificat­e can pass muster and that there is a waiver on facts is not a possible conclusion, and such finding is, therefore, perverse and hence set aside,” it said.

In 2006, Power Finance Corporatio­n Limited, a government of India undertakin­g which acted as the nodal agency, had completed a competitiv­e bid process for developmen­t of an ultra mega power project based on linked coal mines using super critical technology of units of 660 mega watts (MW) each in Sasan District, Singrauli in Madhya Pradesh.

Sasan UMPP was incorporat­ed as a special purpose vehicle by the Power Finance Corporatio­n to implement the project.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India