Millennium Post

Justice delayed

-

Earlier last week, a Delhi court acquitted two men accused of involvemen­t in the 2005 serial blasts in the national capital, which killed 67 people on the day before Diwali. The verdict brought an end to their lengthy incarcerat­ion “From day one, I knew my son was innocent. But it took 12 long years to prove this [fact]. His youth has already passed now,” said Ghulam Rasool, father of Mohammad Hussain Fazli, who was one of the two acquitted in the case. It is often said that justice delayed is justice denied. Going by the court’s verdict, this appears to be a gross miscarriag­e of justice. Additional Sessions Judge Reetesh Singh acquitted Mohammad Hussain Fazli, who was just a college student in Srinagar before his detention, and Mohammad Rafiq Shah, a struggling carpet maker at the time of his arrest, of all charges. Meanwhile, Tariq Ahmed Dar, the third accused, was convicted of being a member of a banned terrorist organisati­on, even though the judge proclaimed that the court found no evidence linking him to the blasts. “In the absence of any evidence regarding Dar being involved in the conspiracy behind these blasts, none of the charges framed against him is made out,” the court said. On the one hand, there is a line in director Hansal Mehta’s “Shahid”, a biopic about the famous trial lawyer, Shahid Azmi, which captures the essence of this case. “Waqt lagta hai, par ho jaata hai,” says one of the characters. “The Indian judiciary works.” The independen­ce of India’s lower courts is often brought into question in such sensitive cases. Last week’s verdict, though, reaffirms the idea that justice is indeed possible. On the other hand, however, our investigat­ive agencies and prosecutor­s seem unable to do a profession­al job of investigat­ing terror cases, at a time when India is putting pressure on Pakistan to take firm legal action against terror mastermind­s living on their soil. What’s even more worrying is that instead of catching the real culprits, our investigat­ive agencies and prosecutor­s continue to find themselves on wrong trails, while framing innocent persons.

In Delhi serial blasts case, the story is painfully familiar. Innocent persons, disproport­ionately Muslim, are arrested by the police in “anti-terror operations”. They are detained for years without any scope for bail, while investigat­ive agencies fabricate evidence, and eventually, false charges are slapped on the accused. There is a growing pattern of acquittals in high-profile terror cases. Mere posturing against terror is not enough. India needs a systemic overhaul of how it investigat­es and prosecutes such cases. The list of terror attacks, where our security agencies failed to carry out a rigorous probe while ending up framing innocents is indeed long. For example, in the Malegaon blast case, investigat­ors continue to flap around aimlessly, unable to nail the real perpetrato­rs. Credible investigat­ions into terror cases, which include the gathering of proper evidence and sitting on the right trail of active terror cells are imperative in strengthen­ing India’s antiterror apparatus. In its judgment on Thursday, the court had some stinging words for the prosecutio­n. At one instance, the court pronounced that the prosecutio­n had “miserably failed” to prove its case regarding who carried out the blasts. The prosecutio­n even failed to establish a clear link between Dar and other two accused.

Another glaring failure of our criminal justice system is the absence of a responsive and active mechanism to provide compensati­on for such victims. These victims of the criminal justice system have neither the means nor the time to deal with the many layers of bureaucrac­y and state agencies that are already disincline­d to believe them. How are they expected to go on with their lives after losing more than a decade to the Indian judicial system? A complete reform of the investigat­ion process of the police and a viable compensati­on mechanism for innocents who languish in jails should be a priority for the government. They must frame proper legislatio­n to fix these lacunae.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India