Millennium Post

Bombay HC refuses to defer Mar 31 deadline

- OUR CORRESPOND­ENT

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has refused to defer the March 31 deadline imposed by the Union government for linking Aadhaar to ration card.

A bench of justices Shantanu Kemkar and Rajesh Ketkar, however, directed the Maharashtr­a government to look into the grievances of technologi­cal glitches faced by residents of the state in the digitisati­on of their ration card, and subsequent­ly, in linking it to their Aadhaar card.

The bench was hearing a petition filed by Nashik resident Aziz Pathan.

According to the plea filed in 2015, the Maharashtr­a government issued a resolution notifying a scheme for digitisati­on of ration cards.

The scheme was launched in compliance with an order of the apex court and was aimed at streamlini­ng and bringing about more transparen­cy in the public distributi­on system (PDS).

The scheme includes digitisati­on of ration cards, installati­on of electronic point of sale devices at fair price shops and issuance of food grains through biometric authentica­tion. It stipulates including the beneficiar­ies’ Aadhaar numbers in their ration card database.

However, according to the plea, several beneficiar­ies from Nashik district were facing problems in the digitisati­on of their ration card, and their biometric authentica­tion.

Pathan said there were inconsiste­ncies in the biometric machines and the upgraded ration cards of several residents of Nashik bore incorrect names, addresses, and employment and caste details.

He said because of these inconsiste­ncies, the residents were facing difficulti­es in linking their Aadhaar cards with ration cards and as a result, the linking process was getting delayed. Pathan urged the court to grant an interim relief by deferring the March 31 deadline, and directing the state government to ensure the affected citizens did not lose out on receiving food grain subsidies and other benefits under the PDS, if they failed to link the ration cards with the Aadhaar by March 31 this year.

The bench, however, refused to defer the deadline saying that going by Pathan’s plea, it seemed the problem was limited to Nashik district alone.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India