EOW reg­is­ters case against Am­ra­pali and two di­rec­tors for cheat­ing buy­ers

Millennium Post - - Mp City -

NEW DELHI: The Eco­nomic and Of­fences Wing (EOW) of Delhi Po­lice has reg­is­tered the case against Am­ra­pali Dream Val­ley pri­vate lim­ited and two di­rec­tors for cheat­ing their buy­ers.

Ac­cord­ing to po­lice, they have reg­is­tered a case on Fe­bru­ary 8 against the com­pany and two di­rec­tors iden­ti­fied as Anil Ku­mar Sharma and Am­resh Ku­mar.

"The com­plainants are the al­lot­tees of the apart­ments in the project of the ac­cused per­sons namely Am­ra­pali En­chante in Noida Ex­ten­sion re­gion. The present com­plaint has been filed by the al­lot­tees of the project who have been duped by the ac­cused per­sons of their life sav­ings. All the ma­jor agree­ments such as MOU have been ex­e­cuted in New Delhi," po­lice said.

The com­plainants were ap­proached by the agents and the ser­vants of the ac­cused per­sons with var­i­ous lu­cra­tive of­fers.

Po­lice fur­ther claimed that the ac­cused per­sons with the dis­hon­est in­ten­tion to cheat the com­plainants formed a scheme in which they of­fered the com­plainants to make the pay­ment of ma­jor por­tion of the to­tal con­sid­er­a­tion of the pro­posed apart­ment and in lieu of that the ac­cused per­sons of­fered to make the pay­ment of the Pre-emi to the bank from which the com­plainants shall avail loan, till the date, pos­ses­sion shall be de­liv­ered by the ac­cused per­sons.

The ac­cused per­sons called this scheme the Sub­ven­tion Plan.

That the ac­cused per­sons had no in­ten­tion to pay any EMI and had en­tered into the scheme only to hood­wink the money of the com­plainants.

"Nei­ther that nor the ac­cused per­sons had any in­ten­tion to de­liver pos­ses­sion of the apart­ments to the com­plain- ants. Till date, none of the al­lot­tees of the same project have re­ceived the pos­ses­sion of their apart­ments even though nearly all of them have paid ma­jor por­tions of their con­sid­er­a­tions of the apart­ments," added po­lice.

In the po­lice doc­u­ment, it was writ­ten that the present case is not where the builder has merely de­layed in the de­liv­ery of the project or the apart­ment, but where a spe­cial modus operandi with the pre­med­i­tated con­spir­acy to dupe the con­sumers/com­plaints herein was em­ployed by the ac­cused per­sons.

Po­lice claimed that a case un­der sec­tions 406, 420 and 120 B of IPC reg­is­tered.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India

© PressReader. All rights reserved.