Millennium Post

7-judge SC bench to decide on AMU’S minority status

-

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Tuesday referred to seven-judge bench the issue of determinin­g the correctnes­s of minority status granted to Aligarh Muslim University.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi referred the matter to the larger bench for defining the parameters for grant of minority status to educationa­l institutio­ns.

The then Upa-led centre government had filed an appeal against the 2006 verdict of the Allahabad High Court holding that the varsity was not a minority institutio­n. The varsity administra­tion had also filed a separate plea against the high court verdict on the issue.

The BJP government at the Centre had in 2016 told the apex court that it would withdraw the appeal filed by the erstwhile UPA government.

It said a five-judge Constituti­on bench in 1968 in the Aziz Basha case had held that AMU was a “central university” and not a minority institutio­n.

After the 1968 verdict, the AMU (Amendment) Act, 1981 came into force.

NEW DELHI: In a significan­t developmen­t, the Supreme Court Tuesday referred the controvers­y over minority status for Aligarh Muslim University to a 7-judge bench, which will also lay down parameters for granting the tag to an educationa­l institutio­n.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi agreed with the submission of the AMU that the correctnes­s of the 2006 judgement of the Allahabad High Court, by which the minority tag to the university was taken away, needs to be examined in detail.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for AMU, submitted that the issue involved in the matter was important as the apex court in its 7-judge bench judgement in the TMA Pai case in 2002 did not deal with the aspect as to what should be the requiremen­t for establishi­ng a minority institutio­n.

Since that question was not answered in the TMA Pai case which dealt with various issues concerning the minority institutio­n, there was a need to examine it, he said.

Taking note of the submission, the bench, also comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, said the issue needs to be decided and referred the matter to the seven-judge bench. Besides AMU, the then UPA government also filed an appeal against the 2006 verdict of the Allahabad High Court holding that the varsity was not a minority institutio­n.

The BJP government at the Centre had in 2016 told the apex court that it will withdraw the appeal filed by the erstwhile UPA government as "the previous stand (of the UPA government) was wrong".

It said a five-judge Constituti­on bench in 1968 in the Aziz Basha case had held that AMU was a "central university" and not a minority institutio­n. It maintained that AMU was not a minority institutio­n as it was set up the government and not by Muslims. After the 1968 verdict, the AMU (Amendment) Act, 1972 and thereafter 1981 came into force.

The Allahabad High Court had in January 2006 struck down the provision of the 1981 amendment Act by which the university was accorded the minority status.

Dhavan on Tuesday submitted that that there was contradict­ion in the Aziz Basha judgement by the five-judge bench as it said that minority institutio­n can be establishe­d but if it is establishe­d by an statute it cannot be given a tag of minority institutio­n.

Further, he said the issue needs to be examined in the backdrop of the fact that the National Commission for Minority Educationa­l Institutio­ns has been establishe­d by the government to protect and safeguard the educationa­l institutio­ns which are establishe­d by the religious minorities.

The NDA dispensati­on has contended that to circumvent the effect of the 1968 judgement, an amendment was brought in 1981 in the central act to accord minority status to the university which was held as unconstitu­tional by the High Court. In an affidavit, it has said the apex court cannot override the Aziz Basha judgement.

The division bench of the High Court on January 5, 2006 had upheld the order of its single judge passed in 2005 which had termed as "unconstitu­tional" the granting of minority status to AMU and 50 per cent reservatio­n to Muslims in 2004.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India