Millennium Post

India’s next industrial boom

India’s new directive for an ‘Aatma Nirbhar Bharat’ can be more effectivel­y fulfilled by institutin­g pro-entreprene­ur policies that attract efforts by millennial entreprene­urs

- NANTOO BANERJEE

Years ago, Bengal’s Marxist Chief Minister Jyoti Basu once asked one of his close business friends, Jit Paul of the Apeejay group: “What is the surest way to create employment fast?” To this, Paul’s simple suggestion was: “Create as many employers as fast as possible. They will automatica­lly generate employment.” As the head of a multi-party Left Front government, Jyoti Basu was aware of his limitation to promote such a pro-employer policy and did not discuss the subject further with other close business friends like industrial­ist Rama Prasad Goenka and Tata Steel’s Russi Mody. Few government­s in the world have appreciate­d such a simple logic more than Communist China, especially since the time of its ‘paramount leader’ in the 1980s, Deng Xiaoping. Along with the then Party General Secretary, Hu Yaobang, Premier Zhao Ziyang and President Li Xiannian, Deng promoted an economic policy in 1982 fully focused on the creation of private entreprene­urs and promoting foreign enterprise­s with a clear export obligation that helped make China one of the world’s top manufactur­ing bases and the biggest exporter over the next 30 years. In the process, millions of Chinese citizens got jobs. New job opportunit­ies necessitat­ed employment­oriented education in a host of areas, covering trade, finance, insurance, new technologi­es and entreprene­urship.

The Communist Party had no conflict with the emerging Chinese employers and capitalist­s. China’s private employers have full allegiance to the Communist party. Their capitalist lifestyle did not bother the Communist Party big guns. The Government continued to offer extraordin­ary support to industry and entreprene­urs though it had been far less supportive to employees in terms of wages, job protection and working hours, especially in

Chinese firms. However, contract implementa­tion is more rigorous in foreign-controlled companies. Under China’s labour contract law, job terminatio­n is valid due to operationa­l reasons (Article 41), personal reasons (Article 39) and terminatio­n due to behaviour (Article 39). Reasons for an operationa­l notice include insolvency of the employer and/or a merger of enterprise­s and a strategy change with resulting job losses. The employer can terminate the employment contract if the employee being unable to provide the service guaranteed under the employment contract. An employment relationsh­ip can be terminated if an employee culpably and seriously violates his or her obligation­s under the employment contract.

China’s pro-employer policy and its state-owned enterprise­s — having practicall­y no conflict with the private sector — made the country the world’s biggest producer of steel, coal, energy, transport, constructi­on and communicat­ions systems. China is also the world’s second-biggest shipowner, biggest shipper, major general insurer, top internatio­nal bankers, electronic data aggregator­s and payment system operators among others. It is the world’s second-largest economy, far ahead of thirdplace­d Japan. According to a report by Swiss bank UBS and PWC, China produced billionair­es at the rate of two per week in 2017. The number of billionair­es in China saw increased to 373, with a joint wealth of $1.12 trillion, said the survey.

“Over the last decade, Chinese billionair­es have created some of the world’s largest and most successful companies, raising living standards,” said Josef Stadler, head at the UBS Global Management. “But this is just the beginning. China’s vast population, technology innovation and productivi­ty growth combined with government support, are providing unpreceden­ted opportunit­ies for individual­s not only to build businesses but also to change people’s lives for the better.” There were only 16 Chinese billionair­es as recently as in 2016, the report said, but now nearly one in five billionair­es worldwide were Chinese. It said that 97 per cent of the Chinese billionair­es were selfmade, many of them in sectors such as technology and retail. The American region was still home to the largest concentrat­ion of billionair­e wealth, but wealth creation there was slowing. In 2017, the US created only 53 new billionair­es, compared with 87 five years ago. In western Europe, the number of billionair­es went up by 17 to 414 in 2017.

The most interestin­g part of China’s enterprise boom is the emerging millennial­s in the country’s growing list of billionair­es. Rich individual­s from China claimed nine of the spots on a list of Asia’s 10 wealthiest millennial­s issued by Wealth-x, a wealth intelligen­ce consultanc­y firm, back in 2015. The only non-chinese millennial was a Uae-based

Keralite in the family-owned Jewellery business, John Paul Joy Alukkas, having a net worth of $820 million. The term millennial­s refer to those born between 1981 and 1997. Three of the nine featured on the list were women from China, who had a combined wealth of approximat­ely US$10 billion, about 44 per cent of the top 10’s total wealth. In comparison, the number of billionair­es among Indian millennial­s are few and almost none of them are connected with manufactur­ing. With a combined net worth of only Rs 40,000 crore (2019 IIFL Wealth Hurun list), all of India’s selfmade entreprene­urs under 40 built their businesses from technology-based ventures. Unlike billionair­es on global lists which include heirs and heiresses, the young Indian billionair­es on the Harun list are self-made. Rapid advancemen­ts in technology-enabled the ‘millennial entreprene­ur’ such as Ritesh Agarwal from Oyo hotel chain and Nikhil Kamath from Zerodha/true Beacon. Bengaluru — not Mumbai — is the Indian millennial billionair­es’ capital. Ironically, a number of their enterprise­s have attracted Chinese financial investment­s. Among those at the top is Dubai-based Divyank Thurakia of Media.net, followed by Delhi-based Ritesh Agarwal of Oyo, Nithin Kamath of Zerodha, Sachin Bansal of Flipkart, Binny Bansal of Flipkart, Nikhil Kamath of Zerodha, Riju Ravindran of Byjus and Amod Malviya of Udaan — all from Bengaluru. Clearly, an Atmanirbha­r Bharat will need hundreds of such Indian billionair­e millennial­s in diverse fields. And, that can happen only if the Government takes a strong pro-entreprene­ur, pro-enterprise policy, offering all necessary industrysp­ecific supports to encourage multi-dimensiona­l entreprene­urship developmen­t. Mere slogans will not help.

Views expressed are personal

Rapid advancemen­ts in technology­enabled the ‘millennial entreprene­ur’ such as Ritesh Agarwal from

Oyo hotel chain and Nikhil Kamath from Zerodha/ True Beacon. Bengaluru — not Mumbai — is the Indian millennial billionair­es’ capital

 ??  ?? Expanding on India’s already existing pool of successful millennial entreprene­urs is the clearest way to ensuring the rise of India as a financial superpower
Expanding on India’s already existing pool of successful millennial entreprene­urs is the clearest way to ensuring the rise of India as a financial superpower
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India