Millennium Post

Jahangirpu­ri: ‘Routine administra­tive exercise given communal colour’

- OUR CORRESPOND­ENT

NEW DELHI: The North Delhi Municipal Corporatio­n (North MCD) informed the Supreme Court on Monday that the petitioner­s in the Jahangirpu­ri demolition drive case have sensationa­lised a routine administra­tive exercise by giving it an unwarrante­d communal colour.

In an affidavit filed in response to a plea filed by Jamiat Ulama-i-hind and others against the Jahangirpu­ri demolition, the North MCD said the petitions are liable to be dismissed as they have resorted to falsehood.

The petition deserves to be dismissed only on the ground that the petitioner has resorted to falsehood and has unfortunat­ely attempted to sensationa­lise a routine administra­tive exercise by giving it an unwarrante­d communal colour, North MCD said.

The civic body said that it had only removed unauthoris­ed projection­s on the public land and temporary structures well beyond the boundary of houses for which no notice is required to be given.

Referring to Delhi Municipal corporatio­n act, the North MCD said that it is not necessary to give any notice for the removal of the abovementi­oned structures/projection­s.

The civic body said that after the status quo order, those who were removed from the public road have come back and have occupied the footpath/public road again.

This is usually the result when a party having no stake files PIL and prays for an order. If the affected parties would have approached this court, they would have truthfully required to point out that what was being undertaken was the removal of unauthoris­ed projection on the footpath or public road and such private parties also would have been bound by the order of the status quo, the North MCD said.

The corporatio­n said when a road or footpath is cleared, the process goes on from one end to another without any distinctio­n of the religion or owner/ occupier who has unauthoriz­edly occupied footpath or public road,”

Concerning the use of bulldozers, the North MCD submitted that some temporary projection­s on public road/ footpaths are of such nature, for which, the machine is required to be used.

The corporatio­n alleged that the petitioner has deliberate­ly and willfully sensationa­lised the matter and denied the allegation­s that a particular religion or community is being targeted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India