Millennium Post

BJP used sedition law to suppress voices against its govt, says AAP

-

NEW DELHI: The AAP on Wednesday welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision to put on hold the sedition law and demanded that it be permanentl­y repealed, alleging its “misuse” has increased since the BJP came to power at the Centre in 2014.

The Arvind Kejriwal-led party alleged the BJP has been misusing the sedition law to suppress the voices of its political adversarie­s, journalist­s and activists who question its government­s, both at the Centre and the states and “expose” them.

The AAP said the BJPled government at the Centre should take the Supreme Court’s observatio­ns and the directions in the matter as a “warning” that the judiciary was also “not happy with such kind of misuse” of the sedition law.

While putting on hold the sedition law, the apex court stayed the registrati­on of FIRS, ongoing probes and coercive measures on the matter across the country until an “appropriat­e forum” of the government re-examines the colonial-era penal law.

“We welcome this,” AAP chief spokespers­on Saurabh Bharadwaj said when asked to comment on the matter.

He alleged the Bjp-ruled states have misused the sedition law “a lot” since the party came to power at the Centre in 2014.

“They have misused the sedition law to file cases against those raising voices against the BJP.

“They have misused the law against journalist­s and activists who questioned the BJP government and exposed them. Because of them (BJP), the misuse of this law has increased,” Bharadwaj said.

The AAP spokespers­on alleged the BJP has used the sedition law against its political adversarie­s as well, saying that 13 cases had been filed against his party’s Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh in Uttar Pradesh “just because he was the BJP’S political adversary.”

“Sedition law should be repealed,” he said.

Taking exception to Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiu’s ‘Lakshman Rekha’ remark after the apex court’s direction in the matter, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader said judicial review of laws are necessary when irregulari­ties in their applicatio­n are taking place.

He said it’s “absolutely correct” that there is a ‘Lakshman Rekha’ (boundary line) between the judiciary and the legislatur­e.

“But, the question arises that when the sedition law is misused by the dispensati­on against the political adversarie­s by the ruling party, where will that person go?” Bharadwaj asked.

“He will have to approach the judiciary at the end of the day and it’s the job of the judiciary to review a law when irregulari­ties in their use are taking place,” he added.

Earlier, Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh also welcomed the apex court’s directions to put the sedition law on hold and alleged the BJP was using it to suppress those raising voices against its government.

Taking to Twitter, Singh, who is also the AAP spokespers­on, claimed the sedition law was “misused” against him in Uttar Pradesh. “The SC’S decision is welcome,” he said in a tweet in Hindi.

“Whosoever tries to raise voice against the BJP government, the party brings false cases to suppress such person. This law was misused against me also in Uttar Pradesh,” the senior AAP leader charged.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India