Millennium Post

Rooting through the history

-

History. This was later printed in the Journal of the Iranian Associatio­n in January 1914. In this paper, he writes, ‘I have said that very few of the statements are properly authentica­ted and some of them are absolutely nameless. They exhibit the most bewilderin­g diversity amongst themselves, and, if we are to believe them, the same event (the arrival of the Parsis at Sanjan) occurred in 772, 895, and 961 Vikram Samvat ie. 716, 839 and 905 AD.’

Dosabhai Framji Karaka in his book The Parsees – Their History, Manners, Customs and Religion (1858) makes the same point about Kisseh-a-sanjan.

‘Whatever informatio­n (about our history) is now in our possession, and is to any extant reliable, is gleaned from a work entitled Kisseh-a-sanjan, which was compiled in the year 1599, by one Bahman a Zoroastria­n resident of Nowsaree, from the traditions extant in his time.’ He adds, ‘various meagre and unsatisfac­tory traditions exist concerning the tide of emigration, the manner in which it was effected, and the total number of those who left the shores of Gulf.’

In the foreword of Hodiwala explains: the history of the from the hoary past down to the 16th Century after Christ is almost a blank. Open the first volume of the Parsi Prakash, that monumental work of the Late Khan Bahadur Bomanji B. Patel, and you will find that only 3 or 4 pages have been devoted to events connected with the Parsis during the above-mentioned period. He continues: According to the account of the about 115 years after the overthrow of the Sassanian dynasty, a number of Zoroastria­ns came to India and landed at Div off the coast of Kathiawar. Having stayed there for 16 years, they went to Sanjan. If we take the battle of Naharend (AD 641) to have decided the fate of the Persian Empire, it would appear that the Zoroastria­ns landed at Sanjan in AD 775. Some scholars, taking AD 651 (when the King Yezdagard was killed) as the starting, arrive at the starting date AD 785.

Ervad Maneckji R Unwala has got a manuscript about 150 years old, which gives a slightly different account from that of the The

Ancient India, India Parsis of ancient Kisseh-a-sanjan Parsis of Kisseh-a-sanjan.

date is 716 AD and not 775 or 785 AD, beside this there is no landing at Div. The reason for this difference is the accounts maybe, as suggested by Wilford, that the history of at least 2 bands of refugees has been mixed up. Such discrepanc­ies, coupled with other circumstan­ces, have led some scholars to challenge every detail of the

Kisseh-a-sanjan.

It is a pity that there is no historical record of the Parsis’ arrival in India, no list of names and no count of landed persons

Hodiwala also says: Nothing indeed, can be a greater error than to suppose that Bahman was a great poet, a serious historian or a man of multifario­us and accurate scholarshi­p. At the same time, he was not an ordinary man. He belonged to a family possessing remarkable literary aptitudes and it would be folly to suppose that all his statements are unworthy of credit. But it must be also recognized that he is occasional­ly out of his depth.

Did they come by sea? Hodiwala believes: ‘It is very likely that in accordance with their tradition, they came (by land) hugging the coast – thus avoiding the dangers of the sea and the risk of breaking the rule about not defiling the sea with human impurities. The purificati­on ritual to be observed after travelling by boat (over water) as recorded in the Rivayats were filed in court in the Saklat vs Bella lawsuit.

(Excerpted with permission from

Prochy N Mehta’s Who is a Parsi?; Niyogi Books)

published by

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India