Mint Hyderabad

‘My realty investment­s have bettered those of equity ’

- Sashind Ningthoukh­ongjam sashindnj@livemint.com A MINT SERIES

The covid pandemic has been one reason why the real estate sector is getting the cold-shoulder treatment from investors. The pandemic dealt a blow to the returns generated by this investment avenue. Post the pandemic, there were lots of doomsday prophecies about the real estate sector, says Aashish Somaiyaa, chief executive officer of White Oak Asset Management Company (AMC). That was when he took a contrarian view and diversifie­d his portfolio into real estate. There have been no regrets. “It has played out really well. For me real estate has outperform­ed the equities portfolio,” he says in an interview with Mint for Guru portfolio series. In this series, leaders in the financial services industry share how they manage their own money. Edited excerpts from the interview:

You invested 50% of your portfolio in real estate (residentia­l and commercial properties) during the pandemic. How is that panning out?

It has played out really well. For me real estate has outperform­ed the equities portfolio. If you remember, around the end of 2020 and early 2021, the stock market had already recovered from the covid lows. But as far as real estate was concerned, there were lots of doomsday prophecies. That was when I took a contrarian view and diversifie­d my portfolio into real estate.

This move happened primarily because I read the book Capital returns by Edward Chancellor. It said ‘the sector which will do well is a sector which has gone through consolidat­ion among a number of players and which has seen the least amount of capital deployment in the past 10 years.’

From 2010-11 till 2020, real estate went through a terrible time with many attacks on the parallel economy due to the goods and services tax (GST) regime, demonetiza­tion and other reasons. There were so many challenges and phases whereby real estate had a lean patch but I see real estate as another way to participat­e in India’s economy

Around half my portfolio is still in equities and I ensure that it doesn’t go below 40-50%. I will start rebalancin­g in favour of equities in the next 12 months.

Did you say your real estate gave better returns than your equity portfolio?

When I say that my real estate is performing better than my equity portfolio, most people will not believe it. But I’ll tell you how it works.

If you put in ₹2 crore, then the bank can sanction you a loan of ₹8 crore and with it you can buy a property worth ₹10 crore. If you lease this property to any major bank to run a branch, then the lease is locked in for the next 10 years. Secondly, the rent goes up by 15% every three years. And imagine if you had bought this property at the bottom of the real estate cycle, during covid, then you would have done very well.

Some might say ₹2 crore in equities became ₹4 crore in the past 3 years. Now that is correct, but who knew equities would double three years ago. On the other hand, you knew that if some big bank was your tenant, then there is stability in rental income.

mThis seems quite unconventi­onal as you’re the CEO of an equity oriented AMC? Can you please expand on this?

The convention­al wisdom is that you should never leverage. But the biggest sector in the listed equity space is financials and they are all leveraged and help people take leverage. There is something called a ‘healthy leverage’.

I would like to reiterate here that nobody should do what I’m doing but everybody should definitely challenge the convention­al wisdom or thought process.

When did you buy your first house?

I bought my first house when I was 28, in 2004. At that time, I was working with ICICI Pru Mutual fund. The regulation­s then were very different and they used to give 90% financing. So when I was 28 years old, I put in ₹6 lakh and the bank gave another ₹75 lakh and I bought a house worth ₹81 lakh. By 2007, the developer gave possession of the flat but I continued to stay with my mother. I put that house on rent. That rent eased my EMI (equated monthly instalment) burden but here’s the interestin­g part. In 2010, I sold that house for ₹2.3 crore.

For me, real estate is a derivative of equity. For far too long, people have been saying they are bullish on the Indian economy but not on real estate. That’s completely wrong according to me. You cannot say you’re bullish on the Indian economy by being bearish on real estate.

What about your equity allocation­s? Did you have allocation to small- and mid-caps which have had a run-up in the past year?

We have a policy in our company that we should only invest through WhiteOak funds. We have flexi-cap and multi-cap kind of strategies. I don’t decide myself where to take specific allocation. My portfolio goes along with what our portfolio manager and fund house does. And what I’ve found is that we have been consistent­ly at about 30-40% in mid- and small-caps and that is what my allocation would also reflect. Among these, my highest allocation would be towards White Oak’s flexi-cap fund. In our flexi-cap fund, our broad thinking is that we will have anywhere between 30% and 70% in small- and mid-caps at all times. I’m comfortabl­e with that. Instead of me doing all the adjustment­s, I leave it to my fund managers.

What about your retirement plan?

It’s interestin­g that one of the reasons why I invested in commercial real estate is that if I can slowly and steadily pay off the EMIs, then I’ll have an income for the rest of my life. Frankly, that’s my retirement plan although I don’t plan to retire anytime soon.

One more thing. You should never leverage for something which doesn’t generate income. If you do that, it means you have to pay the entire cost of leverage from your pocket. The smart leverage pays for the asset leverage. If you see, in the long term, the asset pays for itself.

(For an extended version of this interview, go to livemint.com)

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India