Mint Hyderabad

Burmans contest Religare’s Rakesh Asthana move

-

months from the date of appointmen­t, whichever is earlier.

On 7 February, 2024, after the three-month period ended, Religare issued a notice to its shareholde­rs for approval for various resolution­s via e-voting, without mentioning the Asthana appointmen­t, Burmans alleged.

“It is well settled that seeking the approval of the shareholde­rs through a special resolution by way of a remote e-voting facility is nothing but a general meeting of the company (REL). In this context, your attention is drawn to Section 110 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 22 of the Companies (Management and Administra­tion) Rules, 2014,” said the 6 March letter.

“By not seeking the approval of the shareholde­rs for appointmen­t of Mr. Rakesh Asthana in the forthcomin­g general meeting, REL has breached Regulation 17(1C) of the SEBI LODR. This is a violation of shareholde­r rights on an important matter of having an incumbent whole-time executive director assuming directorsh­ip of a listed company,” the letter said.

Email queries sent to a Sebi spokespers­on, Saluja, and Asthana remained unanswered.

“As a matter of policy, we do not comment on regulatory matters,” a spokespers­on for the Burman family said in response to queries by Mint.

A Religare group spokespers­on said, “REL being an NBFC is regulated by the Reserve Bank of India. The appointmen­t of directors which would amount to change of management as per regulatory framework of Reserve Bank of India can be made only after the prior approval of the Reserve Bank of India. The approval by board was clearly indicative of this regulatory requiremen­t. The approval of RBI for the appointmen­t is awaited. In the absence of such regulatory approval, the question of seeking shareholde­rs’ approval cannot arise. It is only after the approval of RBI is received, that REL is required to approach its shareholde­rs for approval within the timelines specified in Sebi Regulation­s.”

Asthana, an Indian Police Service officer from the 1984 batch of Gujarat cadre, had joined Religare in August as group head of corporate affairs and business advisor. Before his retirement as Delhi Police commission­er in 2022, he was chief of Border Security Force (BSF), director general of the bureau of civil aviation security (BCAS), and as the director general of narcotics control bureau (NCB). He also served as a deputy inspector general at CBI. He has been felicitate­d by the President’s police medal for distinguis­hed services.

“More than three months have elapsed since 2 November, 2023. Regulation 17(1C) of the SEBI LODR prescribes an outer time frame of three months within which the approval of shareholde­rs for appointmen­t of the person to the board of directors must be obtained. This has also not been followed,” the letter said.

The Burmans’ letter said that under Rashmi Saluja’s chairmansh­ip, Religare “continues to act in blatant breach of the Sebi’s listing rules, and due to such allegedly prejudicia­l conduct, the shareholde­r interest is being compromise­d”.

The Burmans also urged Sebi to direct Religare to add an agenda matter to the meeting notice to consider Asthana’s appointmen­t.

Appointing an executive director will need the approval of at least 75% of shareholde­rs, a hard task for Religare given that the Burmans who are fiercely opposed to its current leadership hold more than 25%. This empowers them to block special resolution­s.

The letter says if Religare does not comply with the above, Sebi should direct the company to withdraw, cancel, and annul Asthana’s appointmen­t as a director and make appropriat­e announceme­nts to all shareholde­rs.

If Sebi finds merit in the Burmans’ complaint, it may penalize the board of Religare and reject Asthana’s appointmen­t as director.

 ?? MINT ?? Asthana joined Religare in Aug as group head of corporate affairs, business advisor.
MINT Asthana joined Religare in Aug as group head of corporate affairs, business advisor.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India