Need for a full-time Minister of Defence

While the appointmen­t of Manohar Parrikar as the Goa Chief Minister has been dictated by political expediency, this move has implicatio­ns for the Indian armed forces

- The views expressed herein are the personal views of the author.

While the nation was coming to terms with the somewhat stunning but not entirely unexpected results of the elections in five states, the Indian armed forces are yet to appreciate the repercussi­ons of the change in the political leadership as Minister of Defence, Manohar Parrikar, moved to Goa to don the mantle of the Chief Minister, a position he had held before moving to Delhi in 2015. He has now been replaced by Arun Jaitley, the Minister of Finance, who is holding the post of Minister of Defence as ‘Additional Charge’.

While the appointmen­t of Parrikar as the Chief Minister of Goa at this juncture has been dictated by considerat­ions of political expediency for the party in power, this somewhat sudden move has implicatio­ns for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and in turn for the Indian armed forces. After a decade of deep slumber, in 2015, the Ministry of Defence under the NDA government with Manohar Parrikar as the Minister of Defence, embarked upon a number of reforms in the defence sector. At the outset, the NDA government is looking to turn the Indian Army into one of the finest fighting forces in the world with infrastruc­ture and manpower to match rhetoric with action and cope with the emerging challenges. The Shekatkhar Committee report on the major reforms required has been submitted to the MoD and its recommenda­tions are yet to be implemente­d.

While Parrikar had unveiled the restructur­ed Defence Procuremen­t Procedure (DPP) at the Defexpo in Goa in 2016, the document did not contain the chapter on Strategic Partnershi­p with the private sector for the indigenous production of military hardware. This component of the DPP 2016 which Parrikar had promised to include at a later date, continues to remain as an unfinished agenda. This is a critical requiremen­t in the context of the ‘Make in India’ programme of the NDA government as without it, indigenous production in the regime of aerospace and defence will not gather any momentum. Inclusion of this chapter has acquired urgency especially with major programmes for the manufactur­e in India with foreign collaborat­ion of combat platforms such as the Lockheed Martin F-16 fighting Falcon or the Gripen JAS 39E from Saab of Sweden for the Indian Air Force (IAF) and possibly Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet for the Indian Navy.

Another major task on his agenda was to introduce reforms in the regime of higher defence management through the creation of the post of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) of the Indian armed forces. This was recommende­d in 2001 by a Group of Ministers set up in 2000 to review the management of the national security system in the aftermath of the Kargil War in 1999. The proposal to appoint a CDS that was crafted to bring about better organisati­onal coordinati­on and integratio­n of the three wings of the Indian armed forces has been pending for the last 16 years. Parrikar was planning to see this proposal through in the next few months. Linked with this proposal also are plans to bring about significan­t organisati­onal changes through the establishm­ent of Theatre Commands, a concept that appears to be in a nascent stage.

But perhaps the most urgent task before Parrikar was to address the glaring shortages of weapons, ammunition and other items of military hardware the Indian Army is currently facing. The situation in the IAF with regard to the strength of its combat fleet is even more distressin­g as the number of squadrons equipped with fighter aircraft has dwindled to 32 as against the authorised level of 39.5 and is destined to go down further. Parrikar was embarked on addressing the problem through foreign collaborat­ion under the ‘Make in India’ programme as also by ramping up production of the light combat aircraft Tejas by the Hindustan Aeronautic­s Limited from the present capacity of eight platforms per year to 16.

Clearly, keeping the nation secure is an onerous responsibi­lity that the Minister of Defence must carry. This task is undoubtedl­y humongous and will require total and dedicated involvemen­t of the political leadership in its execution. It goes without saying that the aspiration­s of the nation are unlikely to be fulfilled with a ‘Part-Time Minister of Defence’ at the helm. Hopefully, the government will address this issue without any further delay.

 ??  ?? Defence Minister Arun Jaitley with the Minister of State for Defence, Dr Subhash Bhamre on March 14, 2017
Defence Minister Arun Jaitley with the Minister of State for Defence, Dr Subhash Bhamre on March 14, 2017

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India