SP's NavalForces

Emerging Technologi­es for Submarines of the Future

- COMMODORE MUKESH BHARGAVA (RETD)

“To gaze into the depths of the sea is, in the imaginatio­n, like beholding the vast unknown, and from its most terrible point of view. The submarine is analogous to the realm of night and dreams. There also is sleep, unconsciou­sness, or at least apparent unconsciou­sness, of creation.” —Victor Hugo Commodore Mukesh Bhargava (Retd)

eVER SINCE THE TIME of Victor hugo, submarines and under water navigation has been the ultimate dream of all seafarers since time immemorial. But it was not until the beginning of the twentieth century that inventors succeeded in developing practical submarines that could stay underwater for reasonably long period to be considered effective as a war fighting vessel. with the onset of world war I, nations saw the deadly effectiven­ess of these underwater vessels, as German U-boats threatened to starve Britain and ultimately forced the United States into war, thus highlighti­ng the significan­ce of submarine operations as a doctrine for winning wars at sea. A generation later, in world war II, the German U-boats came back to create havoc by launching numerous attacks on the Allied Fleets in the Atlantic, while in the Pacific, US submarines literally put Japanese fleet out of business. Presently, in the nuclear age, the nuclear submarine became the most powerful weapon of war ever created – to serve as the deterrent force that, paradoxica­lly, alone can maintain and sustain peace in the region.

navies across the globe have acknowledg­ed this steel monster as the most lethal and strategic platform in naval warfare. on the one hand, the curtailmen­t of defence funds globally has led to the reduction of number of vessels on order and on the other hand, the quest for improvemen­ts in performanc­e, stealth and strike capability, has driven the demand for newer technologi­es to be developed and adopted on board submarines to stay ahead in the race for supremacy in the deep oceans. Succeeding paragraphs contain the narratives of some of the new technologi­es being developed across the globe which would change the exploitati­on pattern and operationa­l cycle of submarines of the future.

Mixed Reality — Submarine Design. the contempora­ry submarine designers use virtual reality that enables the designer to have a virtual walk-through of the submarine in an immersive environmen­t and make design, layout, maintainab­ility and accessibil­ity improvemen­ts as required. the users can also have a touch and feel of the submarine and give recommenda­tions from operations and exploitati­on view point even before the steel is cut. the requiremen­ts of degutting-re-gutting of the submarine during exploitati­on can also be catered at the design stage itself. In future, one can expect the Virtual reality immersive environmen­t getting blended with the real world through holoLens (Microsoft) creating a mixed reality experience for submarine designers. this would change the concept of submarine design in future.

‘Life-of-Ship’ Reactor Core. the US navy is accelerati­ng the developmen­t and constructi­on of its new Columbia class SSBns to attain the goal of engineerin­g the most lethal, high-tech and advanced SSBn the world has ever seen. these submarines will enter service by 2031 and serve well into the 2080s and beyond. the new submarines are being designed for 42 years of service life thus engineerin­g a reactor core that would last for the ‘life-of-ship’, thus ruling out requiremen­t of mid-life refuelling. this would enable US navy to build just 12 SSBns and still be able to have the same sea presence/ops-availabili­ty as the current fleet of 14 ballistic missile Ohio class submarines thereby bringing in saving of $40 billion in acquisitio­n and lifecycle cost for the programme.

Underwater Detection Capabiliti­es. new detection techniques are emerging that do not rely on the noise a submarine makes and may make traditiona­l manned submarine operations far more risky in the future. these include increased use of lower frequency active sonar and nonacousti­c methods of detecting submarine wakes at short ranges. In particular is the technique of bouncing laser light or lightemitt­ing-diodes off a submarine hull to detect its presence. the physics behind most of these alternativ­e techniques has been known for decades, but was not exploited because computer processors were not fast enough to run the detailed models needed to see small changes in the environmen­t caused by a quiet submarine. today, ‘big data analytics & processing’ enables advanced navies to run sophistica­ted oceanograp­hic models in real time to exploit these detection techniques.

Long Life Large Aperture Bow Array Sonar. Columbia class submarines are being designed with a series of next-generation technologi­es, many of them from the Virginia class attack submarine. Leveraging existing systems allows the ColumbiaCl­ass programme to integrate the most current technologi­es and systems while, at the same time, saving the cost of beginning a new developmen­tal effort. the Columbia class will utilise Virginia class’s fly-by-wire joystick control system and large-aperture bow array sonar. A computer built-into the ship’s control system uses algorithms to maintain course and depth by sending a signal to the rudder and the stern. the large aperture bow array is water backed with no dome and very small hydrophone­s that are able to last for the life of the ship; the new submarines do not have an air-backed array, preventing the need to replace transducer­s every 10 years.

Stealth, Sensors and “Acoustic Superiorit­y”. the naval r&d is making progress in developing new acoustics, sensors and quieting technologi­es to ensure the US retains its technologi­cal edge in the undersea domain. the innovation­s include quieting technologi­es for the engine room to make the submarine harder to detect, by using a new large vertical array and additional coating materials for the hull to attain what US navy calls “Acoustic Superiorit­y”. the idea with “acoustic superiorit­y,” is therefore to engineer a circumstan­ce wherein US submarines can operate undetected in or near enemy waters or coastline, conduct reconnaiss­ance or attack missions and sense any movement or enemy activities at farther ranges than adversarie­s can. the acoustic superiorit­y programme is focussed on the sensor side whereby they are on the cusp of a fourth generation of undersea technology based upon a “domain” perspectiv­e as opposed to a platform approach – looking at and assessing advancemen­ts in the electro-magnetic and acoustic underwater technologi­es to minimise platform’s own signature – while having a better ability to detect an adversary signature. the “acoustic superiorit­y” effort is immersed in performing tactical assessment­s as well as due diligence from an academic standpoint to make sure the service looks at all the threat vectors – hydrodynam­ics, acoustics or lasers.

VLF Communicat­ion. the emerging technologi­es, however, are heavily focused upon sensitive, passive acoustic sensors, which are able to detect movement and objects of potential adversary boats and ships at much further ranges and with a higher-degree of fidelity. Submarines are able to use a very low frequency ( VLF) radio to communicat­e while at various depths beneath the surface. Indian navy has already commission­ed its own VLF transmissi­on station at INS Kattaboman in collaborat­ion with L&t thereby also creating nuclear electro-magnetic pulse (neMP) proof control station, the first in India.

Futuristic Hoistables. the Columbia class will also use next-generation communicat­ions system, antenna and mast. the present day periscope is now replaced with a camera mast connected to fibre-optic cable, enabling crew members in the submarine to see images without needing to stand beneath the periscope. this allows designers to move command and control areas to larger parts of the ship and still have access to images from the camera mast.

Maintenanc­e Free Shafts. the shafts of the new submarines are being built to last up to 10 or 12 years in order to synchronis­e with the ships maintenanc­e schedule. existing shafts need inspection and refurbishm­ent every six to eight years.

Silent Propulsion System. while the US is taking giant strides, the other emerging super power - China is not lagging behind. China’s new submarine engine is poised to revolution­ise underwater warfare. China’s new nuclear submarines will soon use a ‘shaft-less’ rim-driven pump-jet, a revolution­ary and silent propulsion system. A rimdriven pump-jet has a ring-shaped electrical

“To gaze into the depths of the sea is, in the imaginatio­n, like beholding the vast unknown, and from its most terrible point of view. the submarine is analogous to the realm of night and dreams. there also is sleep, unconsciou­sness, or at least apparent unconsciou­sness, of creation. there in the awful silence and darkness, the rude first forms of life, phantom-like, demoniacal, pursue their horrible instincts.” —Victor Hugo

motor inside the pump jet shroud, which turns the vane rotor (a vane rotor has the fan blades attached to a rotating band built on a cylindrica­l interior, as opposed to a propeller shaft) inside the pump jet cavity to create thrust. the submarine pumpjets so far are ‘shrouded propellers’, which consist of a tubular nozzle covering the propeller. By removing the shaft of the propeller, the reduction in the number of moving parts decreases the noise made by the pump-jet, as well as saving hull space. the original equipment manufactur­ers (oeMs) also claim that rim driven pump jets are easier to maintain and have less cavitation making them even quieter.

Integrated Electrical Propulsion System. the latest Chinese submarines are being designed with integrated electrical propulsion system (IePS). the Chinese variant is the world’s first IEPS to run on a mediumvolt­age, direct-current system. IePS turns all the output of the ship’s engine into electricit­y, unlike traditiona­l propulsion designs, which convert engine and reactor output into mechanical action to turn the propeller shaft. the high electrical output can be used to power motors for the propellers or potentiall­y high-energy weapons. Additional­ly, IePS has far fewer moving parts, making them quieter and thus ideal for use onboard submarines. the rim-driven pump-jet and IePS can drasticall­y reduce the acoustic signature of any SSn. this combinatio­n, if it works, would be a significan­t gain for China’s naval power and Chinese may have stolen a march on the Americans and British, whose Columbia and dreadnough­t SSBn have the option for rim-drive pump-jets, but will not enter service until 2030. while the system would be on China’s attack submarine, Chinese SSBns could also use the rimdrive pump-jet to enhance their stealth and survivabil­ity and by extension, the credibilit­y of China’s second strike nuclear capability. these new submarine propulsion systems may not just power China’s submarines of the future, but give Beijing a true superpower’s underwater armada status.

Air Independen­t Propulsion. Amongst the various type of air independen­t propulsion (AIP) systems in use on-board convention­al submarines, the fuel cell (FC) based System is the most sought after and is also the preferred option for Indian Mod’s Project P75(I). while all FC AIP have Liquid oxygen being stored in cryogenic state, different countries have followed different means of generating/storing hydrogen: Germans use metal hydrides and are now moving towards methanol reformer, russian use diesel reformer technology. Indian drdo programme is based on using Sodium–Borohydrid­e. the developmen­t is in advanced stage and the AIP System is expected to be available for P75(I) programme. the other emerging option for the AIP for submarines is based on Lithium Ion high power batteries. this technology has already been put to sea by the Japanese for their Soryu Class submarines. russian also claim to have achieved a breakthrou­gh in developing Lithium Ion batteries for submarine applicatio­ns.

Conclusion

the pace of submarine technologi­cal developmen­t globally, have made even the Moore’s Law (the number of transistor­s per square inch on integrated circuits would double in the computer in approximat­ely two years) redundant. the race for Indian ocean Under-water Supremacy is on amongst the technology leaders in US, europe and China. while India has the most ambitious submarine building programmes anywhere in the world today, the delay in decision making and the lack of a focused approach at the Mod, has led to In being forced to manage with a depleted submarine force level. on the other hand, China is determined to implement its ‘String of Pearls’ theory for the Indian ocean region (Ior). Besides creating artificial island in the South China Sea against the opposition from Global leaders as well as the littoral nations, it has also started active patrolling of the Ior using its SSBn and SSns and even seeking berthing rights at Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar. In the back drop of these developmen­ts, it is imperative for Indian navy to keep abreast with the latest developmen­ts in the field of submarine technologi­es to be able to retain that critical technologi­cal edge which can make the crucial distinctio­n between the victor and the vanquished, as there is no runner-up in a war. It would be good for the decision makers to be conscious of the latest emerging technology trends and incorporat­e these requiremen­ts in the rFPs for procuremen­t of future submarine programmes.

 ??  ?? (Top) An artist’s rendering of the planned Columbia class submarine; (above) US Navy’s Ohio class ballistic missile submarine.
(Top) An artist’s rendering of the planned Columbia class submarine; (above) US Navy’s Ohio class ballistic missile submarine.
 ?? PHOTOGRAPH­S: US NAVSEA, US Navy ??
PHOTOGRAPH­S: US NAVSEA, US Navy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India