The Asian Age

Open court to hear death convict’s plea

-

New Delhi, Sept. 2: Years spent behind bars during prolonged judicial proceeding­s cannot be a ground for converting death sentence to life imprisonme­nt, the Supreme Court today said while ruling that review plea of condemned prisoners must be given an open court hearing.

A five- judge Constituti­on bench, by a majority verdict of four to one, held that “limited” oral hearing for an outer limit of 30 minutes be granted in all death sentence cases.

“Delay in judicial proceeding­s during time taken in court proceeding­s cannot be taken into account to say that there is a delay which would convert a death sentence into one for life,” the apex court said while dismissing the plea of Red Fort attack death convict Mohammad Arif who is in jail for the last 13and- a- half years.

While Chief Justice R. M. Lodha and Justices J. S. Khehar, A. K. Sikri and Rohinton F. Nariman favoured open court hearing of review petition in death sentence, Justice J. Chelameswa­r gave a dissenting verdict.

“Death penalty is irreversib­le in nature. Once a death sentence is executed, that results in taking away the life of the convict. If it is found thereafter that such a sentence was not warranted, that would be of no use as the life of that person cannot be brought back.

“This being so, we feel that if the fundamenta­l right to life is involved, any procedure to be just, fair and reasonable should take into account the two factors mentioned above. That being so, we feel that a limited oral hearing even at the review stage is mandated by Article 21 in all death sentence cases,” Justice Nariman, who wrote majority verdict, said.

Amnesty Annual Reports, which was referred to the court, show that not more than 100 death sentences are awarded in any given year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India