The Asian Age

Eco- tourism doing more harm than good?

STUDY SAYS ECOTOURISM MAY MAKE WILDLIFE MORE VULNERABLE TO PREDATORS

- humans than animals that live outside the cities. In many cases, predators avoid urban areas, creating a “human shield” that protects urban prey and can trigger a cascade of ecological changes. But urbanised areas are not the only context where human sh

Wildlife population­s are suffering death by a thousand cuts as a result of human activities. Wildlife is being hunted, fished and poached. They are suffering from climate change and pollution. Diseases take their toll, as do newly invasive species. They are also being fragmented as a function of increased habitat destructio­n.

These are obvious culprits of environmen­tal disruption. But there is one realm where we may be having an unanticipa­ted impact on wildlife: naturebase­d tourism.

It is possible that our increasing penchant for nature tourism is making wildlife in these areas more vulnerable to predators. Unfortunat­ely, we don’t yet have enough data to properly assess this risk.

A study attempts to understand how animals may become more docile, bolder and less fearful when exposed to humans. Researcher­s suggest this could then potentiall­y lead to an increased risk of predation when people leave the area, signalling an unrecognis­ed cost of ecotourism.

A ‘ HUMAN SHIELD’

To domesticat­e animals, we must tame them and this often means deliberate­ly selecting those individual­s that are more docile and tolerant. Domesticat­ion is, in part, achieved by making animals safe from predators – for example by fencing them in, bringing them into our homes or raising them in cages.

We are now learning that urbanisati­on causes similar effects: animals that prosper in the cities are generally more docile and less fearful of

MORE TOURISTS, MORE ANIMALS GETTING EATEN?

According to a recent report, there are more than eight billion visits to terrestria­l protected areas annually. That’s as if each person on Earth visited a protected area once, and then some! This number is even more impressive given that the report only considered visitors to protected areas larger than 10 hectares and didn’t include marine protected areas. Such a human presence on natural areas has obvious damaging effects such as increased traffic and pollution, vegetation trampling and vehicle collisions with wild life . However, a study speculates that nature- based tourism might, under certain circumstan­ces, also create a human shield that makes wildlife more vulnerable to predators.

We already know that this has increased some species’ vulnerabil­ity to wildlife poachers and illegal hunters. There is some evidence that animals that are bold around humans may also be bold around their predators. For instance, fox squirrels from a population habituated to human presence responded less to different predator noises than individual­s from the nonhabitua­ted population.

So if tourism- related human shields are sufficient­ly stable to make animals more tolerant towards humans and if by being exposed to humans, animals become more docile or excessivel­y bold, these individual­s may be more vulnerable when exposed to real predators.

Evidence suggests that animals that are bold around humans may also be bold around their

predators

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India