The Asian Age

‘ No action taken by DDCA despite irregulari­ties’

-

New Delhi, Jan. 18: Justice Mukul Mudgal, which was appointed observer for the India- South Africa cricket test here last month, on Monday pointed out several deficienci­es in the working of DDCA and said it was a matter of concern that no tangible action appeared to have been taken to set them right.

The 27- page report was submitted by retired Justice Mudgal before a Delhi high court bench, comprising justices S. Muralidhar and Vibhu Bakhru, also said the internal audit of Delhi and District Cricket Associatio­n ( DDCA) in its last report had pointed out shortcomin­gs and financial irregulari­ties.

“There are no minutes of the meetings of the committee awarding work. Absence of records hamper transparen­cy,” the report said, adding that “the records relating to contract/ work orders for the earlier matches were not available.”

The high court on November 18 last year had paved the way for DDCA to hold the 4th India- South Africa Test match and appointed Justice Mudgal to oversee the affairs of the match after the cricketing body had moved against denial of permission by the South MCD to hold the match. The report, while highlighti­ng the steps taken during the test match, pointed out 11 deficienci­es in preparatio­n of the match and the functionin­g of DDCA. “Finance/ accounts wing is also involved in preparatio­n of budgets, finalisati­on of annual accounts, giving advise on financial matters. Internal audit ( of DDCA) in its last report has pointed out shortcomin­gs/ financial irregulari­ties.

“No tangible action appears to have been taken by the management and accounts wing on issues raised, which is a matter of concern. Unless corrective action is taken, these shortcomin­gs will continue,” Justice Mudgal said in his report, which was also supervised by I. P. Singh, former deputy CAG of India.

The report found deficienci­es in tendering system, record keeping, delay in payment of bills, allotment of corporate boxes and naming of pavilions and stands, finance, defunct sub - committees, ticketing, broadcasti­ng, media and permission­s.

The report said there was “no transparen­cy” while assigning of duties by DDCA during the match at the Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium here.

“It was also found that the initial bills submitted for the said duties were on the higher side. Upon a query raised by the auditor enquiring the basis of fixation of remunerati­on of the said duties, the bills were subsequent­ly brought down considerab­le by DDCA office bearers,” the report said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India