The Asian Age

Moon’s Seoul to take a softer line

- The writer is a retired ambassador Skand Tayal

The train of events in South Korea that led to the impeachmen­t of President Park Geun-hye came to a denouement on May 9 with the election of a new President. The consistent frontrunne­r in the race and eventual winner was leftleanin­g Democratic Party of Korea’s candidate Moon Jaein. He led in all the opinion polls and finally received 41.1 per cent of the votes.

The other two serious candidates were Ahn Cheol-soo of the centrist People's Party, who secured 21.4 per cent votes, and Hong Joon-pyo of the ultra-conservati­ve Liberty Party, who received 25.5 per cent votes.

Mr Moon, 64, is a person of resolute will and principles. During military service in 1976, he was involved in a daring commando operation in the demilitari­sed zone between North and South Korea. He served as a respected human rights lawyer in the difficult days of authoritar­ian rule in the 1980s. He was chief of staff of late liberal President Roh Moo-hyun and has rich experience in dealing with complex governance issues. In 2012, Mr Moon had lost the presidenti­al race to Ms Park with a narrow margin of 48 per cent against 51 per cent. In the presidenti­al campaign, Mr Moon presented himself as a champion of democracy and an advocate of a fair and just society. His campaign slogan was: “A reliable President to build a decent nation”.

The rightists were on a sticky wicket in the presidenti­al election due to the impeachmen­t of President Park Geun-hye and the antiincumb­ency factor, as her predecesso­r Lee Myung-bak too was from the rightist Saenuri Party. In the South Korean polity, voters in the 50-plus age range tend to be more conservati­ve and the young and middle-aged incline to be more liberal in their social, economic and political beliefs.

In the second place came 62year-old Hong Joon-pyo of the Liberty Korea Party, who represente­d the hard conservati­ve section of the South Korean polity. He was governor of the industrial­ised South Gyeongsang province and has been a tough public prosecutor. Mr Hong promised a hard line towards North Korea, revival of death penalty and a crackdown on trade union leaders who he had accused of shackling the economy. He was clearly out of touch with the public sentiment.

In the third place was a relatively recent entrant to politics: 55-year-old Ahn Cheolsoo, who has been a successful doctor and software entreprene­ur. He founded the People’s Party earlier this year after breaking away from the Democratic Party of Korea, once he realised that he was unlikely to be its presidenti­al candidate. It was a bitter parting as in the 2012 elections, Mr Ahn had withdrawn in favour of Moon Jae-in so as not to split the liberal vote.

Prior to the election, Time magazine had correctly predicted that Mr Moon would be the next President of South Korea and put him on its cover in the week preceding the election. In his interview to the magazine, candidate Moon said that his destiny was to bring the two Koreas together after seven decades of being apart. This goal reflects the dream of his mentor former President Roh Moo-hyun, who tried his utmost for reconcilia­tion with the North. He continued the “Sunshine Policy” of President Kim Dae-jung and had a summit meeting with then North Korean supremo Kim Jong-il in October 2007. After the election, Mr Roh said that he was open to visiting North Korea under the “right conditions”.

With the latest missile test on Sunday, Kim Jong-un has signalled that North Korea would press on with its policy of defying the UN Security Council and the United States. President Roh Moo-hyun condemned the launch as a “provocatio­n” and said that dialogue was “only possible when the North shows a change in attitude”.

What is still likely is that after a complete failure of the “trust politik” of President Park Geun-hye and a policy based on strict reciprocit­y followed by President Lee Myung-bak, South Korea may again embark on a policy of unilateral concession­s to the North. During the last two conservati­ve presidenci­es there was a virtual freeze on any credible direct contact between the two Koreas. In its recent remarks, the North Korean official media has favoured a return to the earlier era of communicat­ion and cooperatio­n followed by the two left-leaning Presidents during 1998-2007.

In his Time interview candidate Mr Moon had also referred to the rushed installati­on of the THAAD anti-missile system on South Korean soil. Reflecting the widespread liberal sentiment, he said: “It is not desirable for the (transition­al) South Korean government to deploy THAAD hastily at this politicall­y sensitive time with the presidenti­al election approachin­g and without going through the democratic process, and environmen­tal assessment or a public hearing (emphasis added).”

In his inaugural address, President Moon Jae-in declared that he would “strengthen the South KoreaUS alliance while seriously negotiatin­g with the US and China to resolve the THAAD” issue. In his telephone conversati­on with President Xi Jinping, President Moon Jaein reportedly said that the “THAAD issue can be resolved when there is no further provocatio­n by North Korea” and added that “the resolution of the North Korean nuclear issue must be comprehens­ive and sequential with pressure and sanctions used in parallel with negotiatio­ns.”

President Moon has inherited a rocky relationsh­ip with Japan, which would need to be repaired. He took the first significan­t step by having a telephonic talk with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe after taking office. The left-of-centre President Moon is expected to walk a fine line between South Korea’s traditiona­l security provider, the US, and the new giant in the neighbourh­ood, China. Both Mr Donald Trump and Mr Xi Jinping have invited Mr Jaein for early summits. Reportedly, President Moon Jae-in will first send special envoys to Washington, Beijing and Tokyo to kickstart serious diplomatic contacts that have been in limbo since President Park Geun-hye came under a cloud.

The immediate foreign policy challenge for the new South Korean President would be to forge a relationsh­ip of openness and trust with the Trump administra­tion so that South Korea does not remain a mere pawn in the high stakes contest between the US and North Korea. Because what President Trump is gambling with is the very survival of Seoul.

For India, the election of the new President is good news. India-ROK relations had got a qualitativ­e boost after the 2004 visit of President Roh Moohyun to India. Mr Moon was President Roh Moo-hyun's chief of staff and is likely to continue on the road to consolidat­e the “special strategic partnershi­p” between the third and fourth largest economies of Asia. In its recent remarks, the North Korean official media has favoured a return to the earlier era of communicat­ion and cooperatio­n followed by the two left-leaning Presidents during 1998-2007.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India