The Asian Age

Supreme Court revives Trump travel ban

Trump calls decision ‘a clear victory for our national security’ Judges to hear arguments in October

- LAWRENCE HURLEY

The US Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his temporary bans on travellers from six Muslimmajo­rity countries and all refugees to go into effect for people with no connection to the United States while agreeing to hear his appeals in the closely watched legal fight.

The court, which narrowed the scope of lower court rulings that had completely blocked his March 6 executive order, said it would hear arguments on the legality of one of Mr Trump’s signature policies in his first months as President in the court’s next term, which starts in October.

The justices granted parts of his administra­tion’s emergency request to put the order into effect immediatel­y while the legal battle continues.

The court said that the travel ban will go into effect “with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationsh­ip with a person or entity in the United States.”

The Supreme Court left the lower-court injunction­s against the ban in place, but only with respect to the challenger­s to the ban themselves and others in similar circumstan­ces, meaning they involve people in the United States who have relationsh­ips with foreign nationals abroad and whose rights might be affected if those foreigners were excluded from entry.

But the court said the injunction­s were too broad to also include barring enforcemen­t of the ban against foreigners who have no connection to the United States at all. “Denying entry to such a foreign national does not burden any American party by reason of that party's relationsh­ip with the foreign national,” the court said.

The court also said it would allow a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the United States to go into effect on the same grounds, allowing the government to exclude from the United States refugee claimants who do not have any “bona fide relationsh­ip” with an American individual or entity.

Three of the court’s conservati­ves said they would have granted Mr Trump’s request in full, including Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch. The case is Mr Trump’s first major challenge at the Supreme Court, where he restored a 5-4 conservati­ve majority with the appointmen­t of Gorsuch, who joined the bench in April. There are five Republican appointees on the court and four Democratic appointees.

The March 6 order called for a 90-day ban on travellers from Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the United States to enable the government to implement stronger vetting procedures. It was blocked by federal judges before going into effect on March 16 as planned.

Mr Trump issued the order amid rising internatio­nal concern about attacks carried out by Islamist militants.

The court said that the travel ban will go into effect "with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationsh­ip with a person or entity in the United States". — US Supreme Court

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India