The Asian Age

Centre to SC: Law to reign in khaps soon

◗ SC bench said “Where two consenting adults agree to enter into matrimony, no individual rights, group rights or collective rights shall interfere therein or harass the couple.”

- J. VENKATESAN

◗ Centre says it will soon enact a legislatio­n to make ‘ honour killings’ at the hands of khap panchayats a cognisable offence

The Centre on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that it will soon enact a legislatio­n to make “honour killings” at the hands of khap panchayats a cognisable offence.

ASG Pinky Anand made this submission before a Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A. M. Kanwilkar and D. Y. Chandrachu­d hearing a PIL filed by Shakti Vahini seeking court interventi­on to prevent honour killings of couples of inter caste marriages. Taking on record the affidavit filed by the Centre, the Bench reserved its verdict on the PIL. During the last hearing, the court had observed that khap panchayats cannot play the role of “conscience keeper of the society” and take law into their hands and asked the Centre to step in to protect such couples from khaps. The bench told the counsel, “Where two consenting adults agree to enter into matrimony, no individual rights, group rights or collective rights shall interfere therein or harass couple.”

In its response, the Centre said the Law Commission of India has prepared the Prohibitio­n of Interferen­ce with Freedom of Matrimonia­l Alliance Bill and 23 states had sent their comments. The remaining states had sought time for giving their comments.

The Centre on Wednesday informed the Supreme Court that it would soon enact a legislatio­n to make ‘ honour killings’ at the hands of khap panchayts as a cognisable offence and to deal with this menace with an iron hand.

Additional Solicitor General Pinky Anand, made this submission before a Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A. M. Kanwilkar and D. Y. Chandrachu­d hearing a PIL filed by Shakti Vahini seeking court interventi­on to prevent honour killings of couples of inter caste marriages. Taking on record the affidavit filed by the Centre, the Bench reserved its verdict on the PIL.

During the last hearing the court had observed that ‘ khap panchayats’ cannot play the role of “conscience keeper of the society” and take law into their hands and asked the Centre to step in to protect such couples from khaps. The bench told the counsel “where two consenting adults agree to enter into matrimony, no individual rights, group rights or collective rights shall interfere therein or harass couple. You don’t have to play the conscience keeper of the society. Law and courts will take care of all relationsh­ips. Whether it is parents, society or anyone, they are out of it.”

In its response the Centre said the Law Commission of India has prepared the proposed Bill “The Prohibitio­n of Interferen­ce with Freedom of Matrimonia­l Alliance Bill” and 23 States had sent their comments to the Bill. The remaining states had sought time for giving their comments.

The Centre said pending legislatio­n the court should issue directions, viz. no person or assembly of persons ( khap panchayats) or family members shall harass, torture, subject to violence, threaten, intimidate or cause harm to any couple wishing to get married by their own choice or couple who have got married and any person committing such act shall be criminally prosecuted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India