Sikri refuses govt offer of C’wealth tribunal post
New Delhi, Jan. 13: Justice A. K. Si kr ion Sunday withdrew his consent to a government offer to nominate him for president/ member in the London- based Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal ( CSAT). The government is understood to have recommended Supreme Court Justice Sikri’s name for CSAT late last year.
Taking note of the development, Congress president Rahul Gandhi said in a tweet that “when the scales of justice are tampered with, anarchy reigns”.
Justice Sikri’s consent was “taken orally for a vacancy” in the Commonwealth tribunal, sources said.
Sources close to the second senior- most judge after the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi told PTI that the consent was withdrawn Sunday evening when the judge wrote to the Law Ministry, seeking withdrawal of his consent.
The insinuation linking the CSAT assignment with Justice Sikri’s participation in ■
■ Continued from Page 1 the committee, which decided on the ouster of Alok Verma as CBI director, was wrong, they said.
“Since this consent was taken in the first week of December 2018, it has no connection with the CBI matter for which he became the CJI’s nominee only in January, 2019,” the sources added. They said “a totally unjust controversy” has been raised by connecting
the two. “True facts are that sometime in the first week of December 2018, Justice Sikri’s consent was taken orally for a vacancy in Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal ( CSAT).
“CSAT is meant to decide service disputes between the employees of the Commonwealth Secretariat and the Commonwealth Secretariat itself,” sources close to Justice Sikri said. Justice Sikri was part of the threemember panel along with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and senior Congress leader Mallikajurn Kharge which decided on removal of Verma from the post of CBI director. Justice Sikri’s vote proved crucial to remove Verma from his post as Kharge opposed the move strongly while the government was pushing for Verma’s removal.
On the CSAT issue, the sources said, “It is not an assignment on regular basis. There is no monthly remuneration. There may be two to three hearings in a year. There was no question of staying in London or at any other place.”
The government has not got back to him on the CAST assignment, they said. “The government had approached him for the part- time assignment last month. He gave his consent. The job required attending two to three hearing per year and came without emoluments,” the sources said.
Justice Sikri wrote a letter to the competent authority in the government withdrawing his consent.
“He ( Justice Sikri) has withdrawn his consent, he has given no reasons. He just wanted to be away from the controversy,” a source close to Justice Sikri said.
The source said Justice Sikri “is a man of very simple nature” and he felt that there should not be any controversy over his appointment.