The Asian Age

Nijalingap­pa has flouted party rules: Indira Gandhi

-

New Delhi: Prime Minister Indira Gandhi today charged Congress president S. Nijalingap­pa of flouting the provisions of the Congress constituti­on in removing Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed and C. Subramania­m from the Congress Working Committee.

“Apart from these objections to your obviously illegal action, it is amazing that while speaking of unity, you should take action which displays your disregard for the unity of the organisati­on,” she said in a nine-page reply to Mr Nijalingap­pa’s letter of today and of October 28.

Ms Gandhi said, “Mr Nijalingap­pa’s action against Mr Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed and Mr C. Subramania­m were patently illegal”.

The party constituti­on and rules did not provide for the removal of CWC members.

She said, “Mr Nijalingap­pa has flouted the principals underlying the party constituti­on, and again illegally and in violation of the party constituti­on,” and dropped Dr S. D. Sharma from the CWC.

Ms Gandhi said, “The actions of Mr Nijalingap­pa only showed that to serve his own purpose, he is quite prepared to flout the provisions of the party’s constituti­on and remove persons who are members of the highest policymaki­ng body of the party”.

VILIFICATI­ON MOVE

The Prime Minister in her letter referred to Mr Nijalingap­pa’s reference to the unity resolution and the need for its strict adherence and said that was not the general impression the country has about his attitude.

Ms Gandhi charged that senior members of the Working Committee were carrying on a vilificati­on campaign against her and her supporters but Mr Nijalingap­pa did not take any action to stop this.

Ms Gandhi regretted that Mr Nijalingap­pa should have cast aspersions on a large number of members of the organisati­on of which he was the head and raised various matters “only to cloud issues”.

Ms Gandhi said, it was “a snap decision by a majority vote” on Sanjiva Reddy’s candidatur­e for the Union presidents­hip that had led to all “the subsequent complicati­ons”.

“Taking such major decisions without any discussion was neither ‘responsibl­e’ nor ‘mature,’” she said.

She said the success of Mr Giri in the presidenti­al election by winning the support of many parties could not be put against her and her colleagues.

She protested against the insinuatio­n in Mr Nijalingap­pa’s letter that those who pleaded for a free vote were collaborat­ing with the Communist Party and the Muslim League.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India