Odd vs Even
Some Delhiites consider the scheme an ‘odd’ity, while others think it ‘even’s out the traffic and pollution situation in the capital. As we reach the scheme’s halfway mark, we see what city dwellers who lie on either side of the debate have to say.
“If you ask me, population is the bigger problem. Those who can’t use their cars will find an autorickshaw. The odd even scheme can’t reduce the population in Delhi, which is the main cause of pollution. Why don’t they increase greenery? Build more gardens? Put a cap on the construction in the city? These are much more prudent solutions to reduce pollution.” — R.K. Avasthi, shopkeeper
“What will happen in 10-12 days? The odd-even scheme is a temporary solution. It must be implemented throughout the year for it to be actually effective. Yes, the pollution may have reduced — but it’s just for a short while. The government must look at a more long-lasting solution.” — Chandraprabha, homemaker and resident of Malviya Nagar
“I think it is definitely effective. I travel by road everyday, and I can see that the pollution has reduced. I believe similar effects were seen when the scheme was implemented previously. In fact, I think the odd-even scheme should be implemented all-year round.” — Surendar, pharmacist
“I have two cars and, thankfully, one is odd, one is even! So, personally, it is not an inconvenience to me — in fact, the scheme encourages my family to reduce the unnecessary usage of two cars on a daily basis. Delhi has finally seen a few breathable days, and the odd-even scheme is to thank. I think it is quite effective.” — Sanejeev Malik, employee at DMRTC and resident of Green Park