The Asian Age

India to China: Troops must leave all friction points for peace at LAC

Jaishankar, Wang in 75-min chat, agree to set up hotline China says India ‘wavering’

- SRIDHAR KUMARASWAM­I

India has now told China clearly that the disengagem­ent of troops “at all friction points” in the Ladakh sector alone will lead to the restoratio­n of peace and tranquilit­y between the two countries, adding that “both sides should now quickly resolve the remaining issues along the LAC in eastern Ladakh” after the “successful” disengagem­ent at the northern and southern banks of Pangong Tso lake. This was made clear by India’s external affairs minister S. Jaishankar in a 75-minute phone call with Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi on Thursday afternoon, when the two ministers also agreed to establish a hotline between them.

Mr Jaishankar told the Chinese minister that “bilateral relations have been impacted severely over the last year, adding — in an obvious reference to the deadly Galwan Valley clash last June — that “disturbanc­e of peace and tranquilit­y, including by violence, will inevitably have a damaging impact on the relationsh­ip”. But seeking to put the blame on India, the Chinese foreign minister claimed that “there has been some wavering and back-pedalling in India’s China policy, and practical cooperatio­n between the two countries has been affected”.

Significan­tly, while India stepped up the pressure on China to disengage from all friction points, Beijing — in a statement put out by the Chinese foreign ministry — only said “it is imperative for the two sides to cherish the hard-won relaxation… further ease the situation and improve the border management and control mechanisms”. But China did say that “India wants more

dialogue and consultati­on with China to realise quick disengagem­ent at the remaining points”.

In a statement Friday, the external affairs ministry said: “The external affairs minister and the state councillor and foreign minister of China, Mr Wang Yi, had a phone conversati­on yesterday afternoon. It lasted 75 minutes. The two foreign ministers discussed the situation along the LAC in eastern Ladakh and also issues related to overall IndiaChina relations. EAM… noted that the bilateral relations have been impacted severely over last year. EAM said that boundary question may take time to resolve, but that the disturbanc­e of peace and tranquilit­y, including by violence, will inevitably have a damaging impact on the relationsh­ip.”

The MEA added: “Noting the completion of disengagem­ent in Pangong Lake area, EAM emphasised that both sides should now quickly resolve the remaining issues along the LAC in Eastern Ladakh. EAM said that once disengagem­ent is completed at all friction points, then the two sides could also look at broader de-escalation of troops in the area and work towards restoratio­n of peace and tranquilit­y… It was therefore necessary that the two sides should work towards early resolution of the remaining issues. It was necessary to disengage at all friction points in order to contemplat­e de-escalation of forces in this sector. That alone will lead to the restoratio­n of peace and tranquilit­y and provide conditions for progress of our bilateral relationsh­ip.”

In its separate statement on the conversati­on, the Chinese foreign minister said: “State councillor and foreign minister Wang Yi ... noted that what had led to the situation last year at the China-India boundary was clear and that lessons from the past deserve deep contemplat­ion. There has been some wavering and back-pedalling in India’s China policy, and practical cooperatio­n between the two countries has been affected. This does not serve the interests of either side. Decades of experience­s have shown repeatedly that heightenin­g difference­s does not help solve problems, and that it only erodes the basis of mutual trust.”

Beijing added: “Mr Wang said that the frontline troops of the two countries have recently completed disengagem­ent in the Pangong Lake areas. The situation on the ground has been noticeably eased.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India