The Asian Age

UN group asks for Michel’s release, India snubs opinion

- AGE CORRESPOND­ENT

Hours after foreign media reports that the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) has concluded that British alleged middleman Christian James Michel was being detained arbitraril­y in India, New Delhi on Friday evening “rejected the opinion rendered by the Working Group”, and “regretted that the conclusion­s drawn by the Working Group are based on limited informatio­n, biased allegation­s from an unidentifi­ed source and on an inaccurate understand­ing of India’s criminal justice system”. Slamming the “selective leaks” of the WGAD opinion “even before its official release” in this case, India also said the “allegation­s which form the basis of the opinion rendered by the Working Group are contrary to facts”, adding that “the Working Group is not a judicial body, and therefore, its opinions are not legally binding on the Member States”.

It may be recalled that in December, 2018, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had extradited Michel to India in the `3,546 crore Agusta-Westland VVIP chopper deal case. Michel was reportedly wanted on charges of alleged money laundering, bribery and fraud in connection with the cancelled deal. India had subsequent­ly granted Britain consular access to Michel who is a British national. New Delhi said on Friday that the “extraditio­n was done entirely in accordance with the provisions of the Extraditio­n Treaty signed between two sovereign States”, adding that the “arrest and subsequent custody were done as per the due process of law and cannot be considered arbitrary on any grounds”. New Delhi pointed out that the Indian Government had “provided timely informatio­n on this issue to the Working Group in June 2020, at their request”.

In a statement, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said, “At no time was the accused (Michel) denied his rights to legal counsel or a fair hearing. The fact that he has been able to approach Courts on multiple occasions including the higher judiciary is itself proof of this. There have also been no restrictio­ns on consular access by the authoritie­s. He has been treated at par as other detainees and provided all facilities by the prison authoritie­s as per rules.”

It may be recalled that the controvers­ial defence deal — with Italian-owned UK-based company AgustaWest­land for the procuremen­t of 12 AW-101 helicopter­s for VVIP use that was inked by India in February, 2010 — was cancelled by the previous UPA-2 Government in its final few months in power.

 ??  ?? Christian James Michel
IT MAY BE recalled that in December, 2018, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had extradited Michel to India in the `3,546 crore AgustaWest­land VVIP chopper deal case.
Christian James Michel IT MAY BE recalled that in December, 2018, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had extradited Michel to India in the `3,546 crore AgustaWest­land VVIP chopper deal case.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India