The Asian Age

Amrit Udyan: A tokenism unmindful of our legacy

- Pavan K. Varma The writer is an author, retired diplomat and former Rajya Sabha MP

The really important point is: How much we have done beyond name changes to actually reclaim our cultural heritage? Our colonial educationa­l system has only seen marginal change.

Name changes of places, towns and roads are not uncommon since 1947. An independen­t country has the right to reclaim its cultural and historical heritage, usurped by a colonial master. The latest change is the renaming of Mughal Gardens to Amrit Udyan. My own view is that this was undesirabl­e, because even if Babur came to India from Uzbekistan (1526 CE), the Mughals — unlike the British — were integrated through the centuries into the many-splendored tapestry of a multi-religious and plural India. Moreover, William Mustoe, the horticultu­rist who created it patterned it on the traditiona­l gardens of the Mughals.

The make-belief by the BJP that Muslims, India’s largest minority, numbering some 180 million, and constituti­ng the third largest number of Muslims in the world, just do not exist, or are all Hindus in disguise, and their presence and contributi­on in India for centuries can simply be erased, does great harm to our country’s plural fabric, the Constituti­on’s inclusive mandate, and the image of India abroad. There were, indeed, atrocities committed by the Muslim invaders. But to revive that memory today, by such transparen­t tokenism like name changes, or to conflate the Muslims of today to their conquering forbearers centuries ago, is simply politicall­y motivated jingoism.

But the really important point is: How much we have done beyond name changes to actually reclaim our cultural heritage? Our colonial educationa­l system has only seen marginal change. Our history books have been inadequate­ly revised to fully reflect the sheer canvas of our history. For instance, not enough space is given to great kings like Krishnadev­araya of the Vijayanaga­r empire or Raja Raja Chola I. Very little has been done to study the political insights of Kautilya’sArthashas­tra, or the Shanti Parva of the Mahabharat­a. The unpreceden­ted renaissanc­e of the bhakti period, lasting six centuries and producing some of the most exquisite devotional poetry, is only a peripheral part of our educationa­l curriculum.

Philosophy and metaphysic­s — the great contributi­on of Indic civilisati­on — are largely marginalis­ed in philosophy department­s, still dominated by Western thought. Most people are ignorant about the audacity of thought of philosophe­rs like Jaimini, Kapila, Gautama, Kanada, Patanjali and Adi Shankarach­arya, to name just a few. The great achievemen­ts of Nalanda hardly figure in teaching courses. Science is taught without sufficient reference to the great contributi­on of Indian mathematic­ians and astronomer­s. English courses are sought after, but knowledge on Panini’s great work on grammar, the Ashtadhyay­i, the scores of other works on etymology and linguistic­s, and the classics in Sanskrit and other Indian languages, are mostly ignored. Our elite schools know about Shakespear­e, but have rarely read Kalidas. Even our airlines carry only papers in English.

The great epics, Ramayana and Mahabharat­a, don’t figure in our educationa­l imaginatio­n, and the remarkable insights of Tulsidas and Thiruvallu­var remain neglected. So many wisdoms of the past, such as the four ashrams of life, the nishkama karma of the Bhagwad Gita, and the remarkably balanced four purusharth­as or goals of life — dharma, artha, kaama, moksha — have not received serious academic scrutiny. Architectu­re is taught without a knowledge of important treatises like the Vaastu Shastra, and the many other treatises that elaborate an indigenous aesthetic idiom. Bharat Muni’s Natya Shastra (200 BCE) — perhaps the world’s first comprehens­ive compendium of the arts — is still largely confined to anonymity. India’s seminal contributi­on on aesthetics, the theory of rasa — again a pioneer in the world — is little known even to students of schools of art. The curriculum of art colleges even now is dominated by Western notions of form and proportion.

Our cultural infrastruc­ture is shabby. There are few world-class auditorium­s and conference centres in the country. Even the Siri Fort auditorium in New Delhi compares poorly to internatio­nal standards. Some temples have, indeed, been renovated, but most of our monuments — apart from a few high-profile exceptions — are dilapidate­d, defaced and neglected. Our museums remain in visible neglect. There is no proper display, no worthwhile scholarshi­p, and no cataloguin­g compared to internatio­nal standards. The National Gallery of Modern Art and the National Museum — repositori­es of so much of our rich heritage — get a few thousand visitors annually. By contrast, the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Louvre in Paris get 2.5 million visitors a year, and the Tate in London 4 million.

We have the most sophistica­ted tradition of classical music and dance, going back to the dawn of time.

How much has the government done to fund and train artists as part of the gurushishy­a parampara, or popularise these genres at the school level so that great artists do not have to worry how to fill up an auditorium for their performanc­e even when entry is free? On the contrary, only recently at the famous Hampi festival of classical music and dance, the organisers brought in ‘Bollywood’ performers, arguing that the audience would hardly respond to anything else. The humanities department­s of most of our universiti­es are cesspools of mediocrity, with hardly any scope for the original thought — moulik soch — the hallmark of our civilisati­on. The state of Indian theatre is even sadder. There are few playwright­s with a national following, little state funding, no committed audiences — except perhaps in Maharashtr­a and Bengal — and India in nowhere close to having its own Broadway.

Reclaiming culture needs resources. In 2019-20, the ministry of culture’s (MOC) actual spend was 0.012 per cent of the GDP. The allocation of the MOC in 2021 was `451 crores less than the previous year — a 15 per cent reduction. This came after a 30 per cent mid-year downward revision of the cultural budget in 2020. The latest budget has only an incrementa­l raise. Simply put, culture is not a priority. Even the National Culture Fund, set up to enable private participat­ion in culture, has become dormant.

Even where name changes are concerned, why is it that in New Delhi — with the exception of two insignific­ant lanes named after Tansen and Kaifi Azmi — there are no roads, squares or gardens named after our great poets, writes, musicians, artists and philosophe­rs? The simple truth is that renaming the Mughal Gardens to Amrit Udyan is empty and dangerous tokenism, that has very little to do with the far more difficult task of actually reclaiming our cultural heritage.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India