The Free Press Journal

SC refuses hearing over Justice Karnan’s plea against jail term

-

Calcutta High Court judge Justice C S Karnan, evading arrest since May 9, has received yet another jolt from the Supreme Court, which has refused to list and hear his plea seeking recall of the order awarding six- month jail term for contempt of court.

The petition was held as "not maintainab­le" by the apex court registry.

"It is thus manifestly clear from the averments made in the petition that the petitioner intends to impugne and challenge the judicial order passed by this court on May 9, 2017, in the suo motu petition.

"The proceeding­s therein were decided on merits and after due considerat­ion, it was held that Justice C S Karnan had committed contempt of the gravest nature resulting in finding of guilt. As a sequel the petitioner also stands convicted and sentenced to an imprisionm­ent of six months. The said findings have since attained finality," an apex court registrar, who deals with listing of fresh writ petitions, said in his order.

"I am constraine­d but to hold that the present writ petition is not maintainab­le. The relief if any lies somewhere else. I thus see no reasonable cause to receive the present writ petition for registrati­on under the provisions of Supreme Court rules, 2013", the registrar said.

The order was passed on May 12 and sent to Justice Karnan's lawyers three days later. Karnan is yet to be arrested.

The judge, through his lawyers, had moved the apex court seeking recall of the May 9 order of the sevenjudge bench which had held him guilty of contempt of court and sentenced him to six months imprisonme­nt by ordering the West Bengal police to take him into custody forthwith. On May 12, Justice Karnan, whom the West Bengal police is looking for, had moved the apex court for reliefs saying neither high courts, nor their judges are "subordinat­e" to it.

"The petitioner, a judge of the High Court of Calcutta, is not under any disciplina­ry jurisdicti­on of either the CJI or the bench of seven judges constitute­d by the CJI, as in the instant case," the plea, filed through lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, said.

He had sought recall of the apex court order awarding him six month imprisonme­nt, saying that he could not be held guilty of 'contempt of court'.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India