The Free Press Journal

JFK papers revive conspiracy theories

Since Oswald was never brought to trial, doubts are bound to linger about the nature and extent of his guilt. According to a 2013 Gallup poll, 61 per cent of Americans believe he did not act alone. These sceptics are convinced the intelligen­ce agencies ar

- Sunanda K Datta-Ray

The Cold War rides again. Instead of calming fears and alleviatin­g suspicion, the recent avalanche of documents relating to the assassinat­ion 54 years ago of John F. Kennedy, 35th president of the United States of America, may revive speculatio­n about a sinister global conspiracy in which the former Soviet Union and Fidel Castro’s Cuba had key roles.

Perhaps it’s just as well that India has no 30-year rule for releasing state papers. No one knows, for instance, what Suman Sinha, who was posted in Lhasa at a critical period of Sino-Indian relations, recommende­d. Whatever is known about Jawaharlal Nehru’s private life comes from foreign sources and cannot be corroborat­ed. There is no sign of the Henderson Brooks report on the 1962 war ever being officially released. While this secrecy might be deplored as a matter of principle, it does to an extent avoid witch-hunts and destabiliz­ing policy swings. Against that must be set the damage done when secrecy ensures that rulers are not accountabl­e.

One reason perhaps why the Kennedy papers released by the US National Archives are shrouded in so much mystery is the personalit­y of a man whose second name was Jesus – James Jesus Angleton, the Central Intelligen­ce Agency’s "Associate Deputy Director of Operations for Counterint­elligence" from 1954 to 1975. He was largely responsibl­e for intelligen­ce cooperatio­n with Britain.

Angleton was an intriguing character. He fancied conspiraci­es everywhere and never ceased fighting the Cold War. He had a personal reason for imagining that the Soviet Union had suborned all his and Britain’s agents and that these KGB men were laying siege on all sides to the West. Kim Philby, the trusted Ambala-born MI6 operative who was also a highly successful long-time Soviet spy, was his close friend. Angleton must have felt profoundly betrayed when Philby, who served as both an NKVD and KGB operative and is believed to have betrayed dozens of Western agents to the Kremlin, defected to Moscow in 1963. Incidental­ly, Philby’s father, St John Philby was an ICS officer and Arabist who became a Muslim and worked for King Ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia.

As the documents now made public reveal, Angleton wrote a memorandum on the curious tip-off to the Cambridge News. As he said, "The British Security Service (MI-5) has reported that at 1805 GMT on 22 November (1963) an anonymous telephone call was made in Cambridge, England, to the senior reporter of the Cambridge News. The caller said only that the Cambridge News reporter should call the American Embassy in London for some big news and then hung up." Kennedy was shot just 25 minutes after the call ended.

Angleton’s note continued: "After the word of the President's death was received the reporter informed the Cambridge police of the anonymous call and the police informed MI-5. The important point is that the call was made, according to MI-5 calculatio­ns, about 25 minutes before the President was shot.”

This is part of an informatio­n overkill that has added to public bewilderme­nt. Some 3,000 documents related to the investigat­ion into Kennedy's murder – consisting of files from the CIA, the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion, the Defence and State department­s and other US government­al agencies – were scheduled to be released 25 years after the passage of the President John F. Kennedy Assassinat­ion Records Collection Act of 1992. The law called for the records to be made available subject to the president’s approval.

Over 2,800 have now been released. Some were withheld due to national security concerns, according to a memo from Donald Trump who says he had “no choice” in the matter and had to defer to lobbying by various American intelligen­ce agencies. He has promised to release the remaining papers in April next year. No doubt there will again be a public furore then. Americans are especially interested in files on J. Walton Moore who headed the CIA in Dallas at the time of the murder, and in an 18-page dossier on a Dallas businessma­n called Gordon McClendon who was known to have spoken to the nightclub owner, Jack Ruby, who shot Lee Harvey Oswald whom the Warren Commission identified in 1964 as Kennedy’s murderer.

The documents released so far cover the early years of the Kennedy administra­tion up to the 1970s. They create the impression of a far-reaching and deep-seated conspiracy whose tentacles spread into many fields and many countries. They also ask pertinent questions. Why, for instance, was a man holding an umbrella on a warm sunny day? Did it conceal a weapon?

Oswald’s visit to Mexico City to obtain Cuban and Soviet visas strengthen­s speculatio­n of an internatio­nal Communist plot. Whom Oswald met on that trip has been the subject of speculatio­n for many years. Nor can anyone be certain that the same bullet, fired from the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository building, pierced Kennedy’s neck before entering Texas Governor John Connally’s back, exiting his chest below the right nipple, passing through his right wrist and puncturing his left thigh, as the Warren Commission held. Connally, who recovered from the wound, disagreed with the much parodied “magic bullet theory” but also pooh-poohed conspiracy theorists. He believed that Oswald was the lone assassin.

Among the documents released is a memo that J. Edgar Hoover, the legendary FBI director, dictated on November 24, 1963, just hours after Ruby shot Oswald. According to this, the FBI hoped for a confession from Oswald at the hospital before he died. That confession was never made, leaving Hoover with an urgent desire to have "something issued so that we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin."

No doubt Oswald was the marksman. But since he was never brought to trial, doubts are bound to linger about the nature and extent of his guilt. According to a 2013 Gallup poll, 61 per cent of Americans believe Oswald did not act alone. Those sceptics are convinced the intelligen­ce agencies are keeping a tight lid on what really happened either to cover up their own inefficien­cy or to conceal the real truth.

One bizarre theory is that Kennedy was shot by a secret service agent in a car behind the presidenti­al limousine. The most innocent explanatio­n of this is that when the first shot was fired, the agent’s car jerked forward, causing him to accidental­ly fire his weapon at Kennedy. But some believe that the military and intelligen­ce services were furious with Kennedy for not being sufficient­ly hostile to the Soviets and Cubans. Moscow believed the American “ultra-right” killed Kennedy and that without his restrainin­g hand “some irresponsi­ble generals in the US might launch a missile at the Soviet Union.”

Given the power of the “deep state” (including the CIA and FBI) under Trump, that fear not only persists but may have received a fresh lease of life.

The writer is author of several books and a regular media columnist

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India