Tennis clocks get good reviews but cut into tune time

New serve and warm-up clocks that debuted in ATP and WTA main draws this week received generally good reviews from players, although hurried warm-ups cut into music time for some. The serve clock gives players 25 seconds to begin their service motion from the time the chair umpire announces the score.

The warm-up clock allows one minute from on-court arrival to get to the net, five minutes for warming up and another minute to get ready to play. “It’s a positive change for tennis,” threetime Grand Slam champion Andy Murray said.

“It’s one of those things in tennis that’s so stupid. How are you supposed to count 25 seconds in your head?”

While umpires have some discretion, the clock assures players and umpires are on the same wavelength when it comes to measuring

“It’s good. I think it would be well to speed it up. Some guys definitely take their time, move bottles around. But long matches are still going to be long matches”

the gap, with ball bouncing and gestures not counted as starting a serve motion.

“It was great. I don’t feel any pressure,” said threetime Grand Slam champion Stan Wawrinka.

“You still have a lot of time and it’s good for the game. For sure you look [at the clock] but you’re always early compared to the umpire.”

The biggest complaints came from two 20-year-old rising stars, Japan’s Naomi Osaka and American Frances Tiafoe. But it wasn’t about the serve clock. It was about one-minute countdown from walking out to getting to the net for the coin toss.

“It’s good. I think it would be well to speed it up. Some guys definitely take their time, move bottles around. But long matches are still going to be long matches,” said 41st-ranked Tiafoe.

“The minute to walk on, I don’t like that. I had to take my headphones off so I didn’t get fined there.”