The Free Press Journal

PUT THE BILL ON BACKBURNER

-

Whatever the fate of the Citizenshi­p (Amendment) Bill in the Rajya Sabha, the Government should not implement it until after talks with various protesting groups, including State government­s, in the North-East. There is nothing to be gained by forcing the Bill down the gullets of the protesters across the entire northeaste­rn region. We are in consonance with the objective of the Bill. Yet, a democratic government owes it to itself to show restraint and understand­ing when a large section of the people oppose the Bill. It may be because of either fear of refugees from the neighbouri­ng countries or a baseless paranoia about illegals changing the demographi­c character of their land, but they must be given a patient hearing before the proposed law is implemente­d. It is true that the Sangh parivaar feels strongly about opening its arms to people of Indian origin suffering persecutio­n and a second-class status in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanista­n. Hindus, Sikhs, Parsis, Jains, etc. became a minority in these countries after the Partition and are treated very badly by the local people and the government­s of the three countries. To make a distinctio­n between them and the members of the majority in these countries is fully justified. Therefore, while ensuring that the illegal Muslims who intruded into India after 1971 are denied the citizenshi­p rights, Hindus, Sikhs and others of Indian origin are bestowed citizenshi­p. However laudable the objective, nonetheles­s it has led to widespread protests all through the North-East. One likely reason is the fear of being swamped by `foreigners’. Such is the distrust that despite assurances by various leaders of the ruling party that such people who seek protection from persecutio­n in the neighbouri­ng countries will be settled outside the north-east, locals in the region have refused to call off their agitation. In this background, it is advisable to postpone the implementa­tion of the proposed law till a consensus is reached on the crucial clause in the Bill. Besides, the ruling parties in the North-East, the West Bengal Government has come out against the Bill. The Trinamool Congress might have an eye on the substantia­l minority vote in the State while it opposes the Bill, but the BJP risks frittering away its recent gains in North-East by pressing ahead with a controvers­ial clause in the Bill. Nothing will be gained by pushing ahead with the proposed amendment to the citizenshi­p clause in the face of widespread opposition all through the North-East. The voice of the people must be heeded. They need to be persuaded so that they can appreciate the real purpose of the Bill. And the Bill should be taken up for passage only after a consensus is reached among various stake-holders in the region.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India