The Free Press Journal

Pawar jumps into NIA row

Says CM’s decision to hand over Bhima-Koregaon probe to agency wrong

-

For the first time, Nationalis­t Congress Party President Sharad Pawar, the architect of the MVA alliance, has taken a public position that is diametrica­lly opposed to that of Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray. At the core of the row is chief minister Thackeray's move to hand over the politicall­y sensitive Elgar Parishad-Koregaon-Bhima case to the National Investigat­ion Agency.

‘‘Law and order is a state subject. It is not proper to encroach upon the rights of a State. Maharashtr­a's support to the move is therefore unfair," Pawar said at a media interactio­n.

On Thursday, Home Minister Amit Deshmukh had said he had voiced reservatio­ns on the issue but he was overruled by the chief minister.

Pawar’s remarks have exposed the vulnerabil­ity of the fledgling 75-day old government to the schisms and fault lines in the loosely knit political collaborat­ion. The Centre's move to appropriat­e the Elgar Parishad inquiry came barely a couple of days after Pawar had written to Uddhav, asking him to set up a Special Investigat­ion Team to re-investigat­e the case, including the role of the Pune Police.

Pawar on Friday was more forthcomin­g when he said Centre’s was an "unconstitu­tional" move that violates the state's jurisdicti­on over law and order. "The behaviour of some in the Maharashtr­a Police (involved in the Bhima-Koregaon investigat­ion) was objectiona­ble. I wanted the role of these officers to be investigat­ed. But ministers in the Maharashtr­a government met police officers one morning, and the Centre ordered its transfer to the NIA at 3 pm the same day. This is wrong under the Constituti­on because criminal investigat­ions come within the state's jurisdicti­on," news agency ANI quoted Pawar as telling reporters.

"It was wrong of the Centre to take the investigat­ion out of the state's hands, and it was wrong of the Maharashtr­a government to support the decision," Pawar added.

Incidental­ly, on Friday, the Bombay High Court rejected the anticipato­ry bail applicatio­ns of two activists accused in the case Gautam Navlakha and Anand Teltumbde - but gave them four weeks protection to file an appeal in the Supreme Court.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India