The Free Press Journal

Are antibody tests for COVID-19 less accurate?

While determinin­g the diagnostic accuracy of the tests, the researcher­s found major flaws and now experts have raised concerns over its usage

-

Areview of studies has found major weaknesses in the evidence base for diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 antibody tests, particular­ly for point-of-care tests performed directly with a patient, outside a laboratory, and does not support their continued use.

Serologica­l tests to detect antibodies against COVID-19 could improve diagnosis and may be useful tools for monitoring levels of infection in a population, but it is important to formally evaluate whether there is sufficient evidence that they are accurate, the researcher­s said.

The study, published in The BMJ, set out to determine the diagnostic accuracy of antibody tests for COVID-19. The researcher­s, including those from Harvard Medical School in the US and University of British Columbia, Canada, searched medical databases and preprint servers from January 1 to April 30, for studies measuring sensitivit­y and specificit­y of a COVID-19 antibody test compared with a control test.

Sensitivit­y measures the percentage of people who are correctly identified as having a disease, while specificit­y measures the percentage of people who are correctly identified as not having a disease, they said.

Of 40 eligible studies, most (70 per cent) were from China and the rest were from the UK, US, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Japan and Germany.

The researcher­s noted that half of the studies were not peer reviewed and most were found to have a high or unclear risk of bias – problems in study design that can influence results.

Only four studies included outpatient­s and only two evaluated tests at the point of care, they said. When sensitivit­y results for each study were pooled together, they ranged from 66 per cent to 97.8 per cent depending on the type of test method used, meaning that between 2.2 per cent and 34 per cent of patients with COVID-19 would be missed, according to the researcher­s.

Pooled specificit­ies ranged from 96.6 to 99.7 per cent, depending on the test method used, meaning that between 3.4 per cent and 0.3 per cent of patients would be wrongly identified as having COVID-19, they said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India