The Free Press Journal

Wearable fitness trackers aren’t useless

Such devices aren’t taken seriously by many, but they are indeed bringing about a change in the fitness industry, experts say

- AGENCIES

Wearable fitness trackers will be on many Christmas shopping lists this year, with a vast range of devices (and an ever-increasing number of features) hitting the market just in time for the festive season. But what does the latest research say about how effective they are? Getting the basics right: Firstly, a multitude of studies have looked at the accuracy of wearable fitness trackers for measuremen­ts related to physical activity, including step counts, heart rate and number of calories burned. They show step counts are generally highly accurate, while heart rate and calories burned are reasonably accurate.

When study participan­ts wear two different activity trackers at the same time, the numbers of steps, minutes of activity and calories burned aren't exactly the same, but they are correlated. That is, when one goes up so does the other, and vice versa. This suggests they are generally capturing the same informatio­n, albeit with slightly different sensitivit­y. Evidence for sleep tracking is a little patchier. Wearables are pretty good at detecting bed time, wake time and overall sleep duration. But estimates for more technical metrics such as the “phases” of sleep — such as REM sleep — don’t marry with medicalgra­de measuremen­ts taken by polysomnog­raphy.

Going beyond the basics: In a 2019 Apple-sponsored study reported in the New England Medical Journal, 419,297 participan­ts without known atrial fibrillati­on wore an Apple Watch. During the study, 2,161 of them received an irregular pulse notificati­on, of which 84% were subsequent­ly confirmed to have atrial fibrillati­on (an irregular and rapid heart beat). This is a serious medical condition that requires treatment to prevent stroke. The ability to alert users of a potential undiagnose­d cardiac condition seems highly beneficial. Although, others have cautioned the Apple Watch can also miss cases of undiagnose­d atrial fibrillati­on — which emphasises the importance of never relying on wearable metrics for medical purposes. Another study published in September reaffirmed the Apple watch’s electrocar­diogram feature can detect serious cardiac irregulari­ties. A similar study is currently underway to evaluate Fitbit’s electrocar­diogram feature, but results aren’t out yet. Building a more advanced tracker: In terms of detecting falls (which would be very useful for older individual­s), scientists

are developing wrist-worn devices that can accurately do this using accelerome­ter technology, which is the same underlying technology already used by wearables.

Meanwhile, the newest Samsung watch claims to measure blood pressure and body compositio­n (such as fat mass, muscle mass and bone mass). Body compositio­n is measured using a method called bioelectri­c impedance analysis. When the

user touches the watch with their opposite hand, it passes a weak electrical signal through the body and back to the watch. The body compositio­n is then calculated using algorithms and the manually entered body weight. At this stage, there’s no data in the scientific literature to support the accuracy of these measuremen­ts, so we’d recommend taking them with a pinch of salt.

Efforts will pay off: That’s the run down on accuracy, but do fitness trackers make a difference in people’s lives? Hundreds of studies have used wearable activity trackers to try to increase physical activity in various general and patient population­s. Meta-analyses (which involve combining results of multiple studies) suggest the devices are effective in helping people become more physically active and lose weight. A meta-analysis of 35 studies in various chronic disease population­s suggested users added around 2,100 additional steps per day after they started using a wearable activity tracker. Other meta-analyses have suggested weight loss in the order of 1 to 1.5 kilograms, on average, over the duration of the studies.

Accuracy and effectiven­ess aside, wearable users typically report being satisfied with their devices. So if you happen to get for Christmas, keep in mind it could help with those New Year’s fitness resolution­s.

—PTI

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India