One judge or 2 to hear bail plea, HC to decide
A division bench asked Virendrasinh Tawde, an accused in the case, to first show how the bail plea can be heard by a division bench
The Bombay HC will decide whether the bail plea of an accused in Dr Narendra Dabholkar murder case should be heard by a single judge or a division bench.
A division bench of Justices Ajey Gadkari and MN Jadhav asked Virendrasinh Tawde, an accused in the Dabholkar murder case, to first show how the bail plea can be heard by a division bench instead of a single bench.
Tawde’s advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay contended that in cases where the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) is invoked, the plea has to be heard by a division bench.
On a court query on whether the earlier bail plea was rejected by a special NIA court or a regular Sessions Court, Upadhyay said that it was rejected by the sessions court.
NIA counsel, Sandesh
Patil, on the other hand, contended that it has to be heard by a single judge.
The HC has asked both the counsels to bring judgments in support of their arguments.
On August 8, 2013, Dabholkar, an anti-superstition activist, was shot dead in Pune at 7:30 am while he was on a morning walk. Initially, the case was probed by the Deccan p, who had arrested some of the accused and recovered the firearm which was allegedly used to kill Dabholkar.
On June 2, 2014, the case
was transferred to the CBI for investigation.
The CBI alleged that Tawde -- an office-bearer of Sanatan Sanstha and Hindu Janjagriti Samiti (HJS) -- was the mastermind. It alleged that Tawade and shooters, Sharad Kalaskar and Sachin Andure, had murdered Dabholkar.
Further investigations revealed their complicity in three other murders -Govind Pansare, MM Kalburgi and Gauri Lankesh. Claiming it to be terrorist act and not simple murders, the NIA invoked the provisions of UAPA.