The Free Press Journal

KILLER IN KHAKI

Life term for ‘encounter specialist’ in 2006 custodial death of alleged Chhota Rajan aide; HC also upholds conviction­s of 13 other accused, including 12 policemen and a civilian

- URVI MAHAJANI & CHARUL SHAH JOSHI / MUMBAI

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday convicted encounter specialist Pradeep Sharma in the 2006 fake encounter of Ramnarayan Gupta alias Lakkhan Bhaiyya, alleged aide of Chhota Rajan, and sentenced him to life in prison. The HC reversed Sharma’s acquittal by the sessions court, observing that it was perverse and unsustaina­ble as the overwhelmi­ng evidence produced by the prosecutio­n had been ignored. The court has emphasised that a ‘squad’ existing under Sharma had executed the encounter, though the same had been banned by the then commission­er of police.

“The prosecutio­n on its own steam and merit has also proved that Ramnarayan was killed by the police, by trigger-happy cops, and the same was made to look like a genuine encounter,” a bench of Justices Revati MohiteDere and Gauri Godse said.

While allowing the appeal filed by the state government and Lakkhan Bhaiyya’s brother, Advocate Ramprasad Gupta, challengin­g Sharma’s acquittal, the HC has asked Sharma to surrender in three weeks. The high court convicted Sharma on all charges, including criminal conspiracy, murder, kidnapping and wrongful confinemen­t and sentenced him to life imprisonme­nt.

Notably, Sharma is currently out on bail in a case registered by the National Investigat­ion Agency in connection with the Antilia terror threat case and the murder of businessma­n Mansukh Hiran. He was granted bail by the Supreme Court last August. The HC also upheld the conviction­s of the 13 other accused, including 12 policemen and a civilian.

The appeals by Police Inspector Arvind Sarvankar and one Janardan Bhange were abated, since the two had died in judicial custody during the pendency of their appeals.

In a detailed 867-page judgment, the HC said that death in police custody had to be curbed with a heavy hand, otherwise it could lead to anarchy. “Death in police custody must be curbed with a heavy hand and must be viewed seriously. There can be no room for leniency as the persons involved i.e. the police, are the arm of the State, whose duty is to protect the citizens and not to take law into their hands and commit gruesome offences against them. The protectors/guardians of law cannot be permitted to act as criminals in uniform. If this is permitted, it would lead to anarchy,” the bench said.

“We find that the prosecutio­n has proved beyond reasonable doubt that Ramnarayan was killed brutally in cold blood by the accused when he was in their custody and that to cover up the same, (had) given it the colour of a genuine encounter,” the high court added.

Reversing the trial court’s judgment, the HC noted that it overlooked “the overwhelmi­ng evidence available against Sharma. The common chain of evidence unerringly proves his involvemen­t in the case”.

Special Public Prosecutor Rajiv Chavan, appearing for the state, submitted that the 2006 encounter had been staged. He further argued that after committing the ‘coldbloode­d murder’, the police, who are the custodians of law and order, had also fabricated records to substantia­te their claims of a ‘genuine encounter’. Further, Chavan said that the call data records and ballistic report showed that Sharma was on the spot of the incident and that he had hatched a conspiracy to eliminate Lakkhan Bhaiyya. The HC emphasised that the prosecutio­n has proved through ‘cogent, legal and admissible evidence that a squad existed under Pradeep Sharma’. The trial court had disbelieve­d the existence of the squad, by relying only on the evidence of the then additional police commission­er of West Region, Bipin Bihari, despite there being ‘overwhelmi­ng evidence of other witnesses as well as documentar­y evidence’, the HC said.

“We find that the prosecutio­n has proved the existence of a squad, albeit illegal, under OA1 (Sharma), by adducing oral and documentar­y evidence,” the bench noted.

The trial court had relied on the ballistic report while convicting the policemen but the same evidence was discarded with regard to Sharma’s involvemen­t. Based on three empty shells recovered from Lakhan Bhaiyya’s body, the ballistic expert testified that one of the bullets was fired from Sharma’s service revolver. The trial court had discarded the evidence against Sharma saying that the “ballistic evidence by itself was a weak piece of evidence, in the absence of any corroborat­ion to the same”.

The HC noted that it did not find ballistic evidence ‘to be a weak piece of evidence’ and its report revealed that one of the bullets had been fired from Sharma’s revolver. The judges have emphasised that apart from the ballistic evidence, there were other circumstan­ces/ evidence, which were clearly overlooked by the trial court, including the existence of a squad and Sharma’s use of a mobile phone which was in the name of another accused, and his being in touch with other accused.

The HC also relied on the statement of Aruna, Anil Bheda’s wife, wherein she had said that Anil had informed her that he and Lakkhan Bhaiyya were abducted by Sharma’s men and taken to the D N Nagar police station and he was saved because one A T Patil had come to meet him.

On November 11, 2006, a police team picked up Ram Narayan Gupta alias Lakkhan Bhaiya, from Vashi on the suspicion that he was a member of Chhota Rajan gang, along with his friend Anil Bheda, and killed Gupta in a ‘fake’ encounter near Nana Nani Park in Versova in western Mumbai that same evening. According to prosecutio­n, Bheda was initially detained at D N Nagar Police Station in Versova and was later shifted to Kolhapur. He was subsequent­ly brought back to Mumbai and detained for about a month. Soon thereafter, Ramprasad Gupta approached the HC, alleging that police had in fact murdered his brother. In February 2008, the HC ordered a magisteria­l inquiry which concluded that it was a ‘cold-blooded’ murder. In March 2011, Bheda was abducted and murdered. His charred remains were found near Manor in rural Thane. His murder remains unsolved.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India