The Hindu (Erode)

The crime that enraged Puducherry

On March 2, a nineyearol­d child, who had gone out to play, went missing from her neighbourh­ood in the Union Territory. Three days later, her body was found in a drain. Rajesh B. Nair reports on the crime that brought the residents of the city to the str

-

Trigger warning: the following article has references to rape. Please avoid reading if you feel distressed by the subject

y all accounts, Nithya (name changed to protect identity), 9, was a cheerful child. She studied at a primary school in Puducherry, a coastal city in the Union Territory of the same name, bordering Tamil Nadu in the south. Her father says she enjoyed playing sports and the freedom of walking or cycling along the narrow lanes of her neighbourh­ood, located at one end of Beach Road, where houses are densely packed together. She would buy biscuits or sweets from small shops. Like many children her age, she was curious.

On March 2, Nithya went out to play. She should have been gone only a short while, but she did not return. Her sister, 11, was the last to see her. Her parents filed a missing complaint.

Two days later, when the police found no leads, her parents hit the streets, along with relatives and residents of the neighbourh­ood, in protest. They staged a blockade on the arterial Mahatma Gandhi Road, demanding that the police make more of an effort in tracing the child. The protesters dispersed only when the police assured them that they would intensify their search and find the girl soon.

When yet another day passed without any signs of progress in the investigat­ion, the agitation began to snowball. Campaigns seeking justice for the girl began trending on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter). Cadres of Opposition parties, including the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, the Congress, the Left parties, the Viduthalai Chiruthaig­al Katchi, and the AllIndia Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, joined the protesters on the morning of March 5. Lieutenant Governor Tamilisai Soundarara­jan and Home Minister A. Namassivay­am, who belongs to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), held meetings with senior police officers to review progress in the case.

The same afternoon, the child’s body, with her hands and feet tied, was found in a drain a few metres from her house. The discovery came as a shock to the city. S. Sundhari, a resident of Nithya’s neighbourh­ood, says, “We have heard that such atrocities happen to girls in different parts of India. But we never thought it would happen to a child in our locality.”

However, according to data furnished by the Puducherry police, the Union Territory with a population of nearly 14 lakh people recorded 164 cases pertaining to crimes against women last year. Of these, 92 cases were registered under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012; 30 on charges of molestatio­n; and nine on charges of rape.

The day the body was found, the police held two men from Nithya’s neighbourh­ood on charges of kidnapping and murder. The victim’s family says they knew the accused. Namassivay­am announced that a Special Investigat­ion Team had been constitute­d under Senior Superinten­dent of Police Kalaivanan to probe whether more people were involved in the case. Earlier, this week, the postmortem report revealed that the child had

Balso been raped.

“Everyone here knows one another,” says Sundhari. “Usually, we tell our children to be cautious while mingling with strangers. Now, it is scary that we have to teach them to be wary of people known to them too.”

The day she disappeare­d

On March 2, at 8 a.m., Nithya’s parents left her at home with her sister and went to work. Nithya’s mother works at a health centre as a help and her father owns a mini truck which he drives mainly to transport fish from the harbour to various markets. It was Saturday, a nonworking day for primary schools. The parents routinely left their daughters at home except on Sundays, when the mother would take the day off.

The police say Nithya stepped out to play soon after. She returned home to eat lunch before leaving the house again. At around 5 p.m., Nithya’s mother came home and only found her older daughter. When there was no sign of Nithya for some time, she went around the locality in search of her, gripped by dread. She went with a few relatives to the police station and lodged a complaint. She then called her husband to inform him that their daughter was missing.

“I came home immediatel­y,” Nithya’s father recalls. “We searched all the areas near our house. Soon, it was night. We thought she may have been kidnapped as there have been reports of child kidnapping cases in recent times.”

After registerin­g a case of kidnapping, the police and the girl’s relatives combed through the entire area. They navigated their way first through the narrow lanes and then the wider adjacent ones, marked by posh houses, large guest houses, and hanging bougainvil­lea. They went to the beach, searching for her near stalls and amid the slippery rocks withstandi­ng the force of the waves. The CCTV footage from the area also did not show any signs of Nithya.

“We initially restricted the search to the child’s residentia­l area, but there was opposition from the relatives. They strongly believed that the girl had been abducted and taken elsewhere. So, we extended our search beyond Puducherry,” says a police officer, who was part of the initial investigat­ion.

Three days after the search, the police finally found the partly decomposed body of the child in a drain. The injuries on her body indicated that she had met a brutal end.

Men known to her

During the days between the time Nithya went missing and her body was found, the police came under some flak. Residents in the neighbourh­ood felt that the response to the missing complaint had been lukewarm. They wanted the police to cast the net wider, but the investigat­ors seemed keen on searching the neighbourh­ood first.

Under pressure, the police intensified their investigat­ion and picked up some suspects for questionin­g. One of them was Kakka alias Karnas, 19, a school dropout. Karnas lives with his mother and siblings some 50 metres from Nithya’s house.

When he was interrogat­ed, the police say Karnas admitted that he had taken the child to the house of Harikrishn­an alias Viveganand­an, 56, a dairy farmer, when she was playing. Viveganand­an, too, lives a stone’s throw away from her house. “He used to give Karnas money to buy alcohol and cannabis,” says a neighbour. “Karnas would often go to his house to party.”

The accused confessed that they raped and murdered the child and dumped her body in the drain behind Vivaganand­han’s house, according to the police. The confession was corroborat­ed by medical evidence. The postmortem was conducted at the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgradua­te Medical Education and Research in Puducherry.

Based on these statements, the police arrested Karnas and Viveganand­an under Section 6(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; and under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including 363 (punishment for kidnapping), 342 (punishment for wrongful confinement), and 302 (punishment for murder). The two men have been remanded to judicial custody and lodged in separate cells at the Central Prison in Kalapet, around 15 kilometres from Puducherry town.

While Karnas stayed put in the locality after allegedly committing the crime, Viveganand­han left for Kottakuppa­m in Villipuram district, about 2 km away. They police say he, too, knew the child. Neither of these men had a criminal past, but both of them were known to get into trouble. Neighbours say Viveganand­an was once beaten up by the residents for his “inappropri­ate behaviour with women.” They allege that his wife left him because she was disgusted with his attitude towards women. Karnas, they say, used to fight with his mother for money after getting drunk. He would also smoke cannabis and get into brawls with the residents of the locality.

Nithya’s father recalls seeing the two accused spend their evenings at the same place where his daughter’s body was recovered. “I have seen Karnas and his friends smoking ganja near the drain. Sometimes, Viveganand­an would join them. We warned them several times not to smoke and drink in public places,” he says.

While political parties and residents link the crime to substance abuse, the police say there is no evidence. “We can’t say the murder is directly linked to drug addiction and alcoholism. But when Karnas was arrested, he was high. It took him hours to get sober,” says a police officer.

The Director General of Police, B. Srinivas, says the police are making efforts to prevent the sale of drugs. So far, they have focussed on cracking down on the supply chain and on sources from other States. There is no organised drug cartel operating from Puducherry, he adds.

“Drug addiction is a social menace which has to be prevented through awareness. While strong enforcemen­t is the responsibi­lity of the police, it is also necessary that various sections of society and government department­s come together to create awareness,” he adds, in officialese.

Srinivas says the police will file the charge sheet in 56 weeks. The government has also decided to approach the district court to fasttrack the trial once the charge sheet is submitted.

Former Lieutenant Governor of Puducherry Kiran Bedi believes that the Puducherry government should not allow more liquor outlets and should reduce its dependence on revenue from liquor. “There is also need for better rehabilita­tion centres, including in prisons,” she says.

Educating the child

Following the incident, the people of Puducherry have questioned the effectiveness of policing, especially the weakness of the ‘beat system’. Under this system, every constable is assigned an area and is mandated to frequently visit it to learn about the issues that the people face.

“In recent times, we have seen a weakening of the beat system. We don’t see anyone patrolling these areas. Senior officers do not conduct field visits. If senior officers did that, inspectors and the constabula­ry would be on their toes,” says Raghu Chandran, a resident.

But Assistant Professor of Criminolog­y at Rashtriya Raksha University, Puducherry Campus, Shivalaxmi Arumugham, says this is not a viable solution. “Although the police do instil fear among the people, we cannot have them around at all times. Community or public vigilance is also important. And any suspicious activity should be reported immediatel­y,” she says.

Her colleague, Nethaji Subash, adds that only a collaborat­ive exercise will enhance public safety.

Karnas even used to buy sweets and icecream whenever he saw my child. I had no idea that he had such a beast in him. Father of the victim

Offenders are often from the family or the neighbourh­ood. Educating children is important. They should know that they can report anything that makes them uncomforta­ble.

Assistant Professor of Criminolog­y at Rashtriya Raksha University, Puducherry Campus

“It will also lead to a better relationsh­ip between the police and community,” he says. “Regular meetings between the police and the residents would help create awareness about crimes and also help people identify potential offenders.”

Arumugham adds that it is important for people to know that those who abuse children are often known to them. “These offenders are often from the family or the neighbourh­ood. Educating children is important. They should know that they can report anything that makes them uncomforta­ble. Education is also important for parents. If they see behavioura­l changes in their child, they should speak to the child. This way, we can prevent atrocities,” she says.

In any society, children should be able to play outside or roam around without fear, says child rights activist Vidyaa Ramkumar. “It is the child’s right to play or roam around alone or with friends in the neighbourh­ood. This is important for the child’s developmen­t. But adult supervisio­n is definitely required,” she says.

Before Nithya was cremated, Chief Minister N. Rangasamy announced a compensati­on of ₹20 lakh to the family. Representa­tives of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes visited them with a cheque of ₹7.12 lakh. A delegation of the BJP, led by party incharge for the Union Territory, Nirmal Kumar Surana, went to the victim’s house on March 14 and gave the family compensati­on of ₹5 lakh.

Money cannot take away from the family’s grief, though. Nithya’s father recalls how he saw Karnas even when he was searching for his daughter on March 2. “He was near my house,” he says, shaking with anger. “He even used to buy sweets and icecream whenever he saw my child. I had no idea that he had such a beast in him.”

 ?? SPECIAL ARRANGEMEN­T SPECIAL ARRANGEMEN­T ?? Two days after the child went missing, and the police had made no headway in their investigat­ion, the girl’s parents and relatives launched a protest. On March 5, the agitation began to snowball and cadres of the Opposition parties joined the protesters. Some protesters at the promenade in Puducherry.
SPECIAL ARRANGEMEN­T SPECIAL ARRANGEMEN­T Two days after the child went missing, and the police had made no headway in their investigat­ion, the girl’s parents and relatives launched a protest. On March 5, the agitation began to snowball and cadres of the Opposition parties joined the protesters. Some protesters at the promenade in Puducherry.
 ?? S.S. KUMAR ?? Protests erupted after the child went missing and there was no immediate headway in the case. Three days after her disappeara­nce, the police found her body.
S.S. KUMAR Protests erupted after the child went missing and there was no immediate headway in the case. Three days after her disappeara­nce, the police found her body.
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India