German chemical producer swaps oil for sugar in bid to reduce carbon emissions
At one of Europe’s largest chemical complexes, German group Covestro is trialling the manufacture of a key product using sugar as a base material instead of oil, as the industry seeks to reduce its carbon footprint.
The pilot project involves producing “aniline”, a chemical used in making foams — used widely in mattresses and armchairs, as well as building insulation. While largescale, commercial production is probably years away, the experiment marks a small step in the chemical industry’s battle to slash carbon emissions as the earth faces a dire climate emergency.
Of the 100 million barrels of oil produced worldwide every day, “a quarter goes directly into the chemical industry,” said Walter Leitner, from Aachen University, which has been involved in the aniline project for a decade.
“The chemical industry needs to be completely rebuilt.”
Plastics manufacturer Covestro — a former division of chemical giant Bayer — started trials at its complex in the western city of Leverkusen at the end of 2023, after laboratory tests.
In
aroom, aniline, a transparent fluid, is extracted from a 600metre network of intertwined pipes.
Using a process developed by University of Stuttgart researchers, fermented sugar is treated with chemicals to make the product. Aniline is used as the base ingredient for chemical MDI, which is an essential material in manufacturing foams.
Traditionally, aniline has been obtained from crude oil derivatives like naphtha and benzene, but producing it emits large quantities of carbon dioxide, a key greenhouse gas.
Around six million tonnes of aniline are produced globally a year, around one million tonnes of it by Covestro.
So far, the pilot project in Leverkusen produces just a tiny part of this, extracting just half a tonne of aniline a day.
Some experts are sceptical about such an approach. The use of plant matter in manufacturing may cut out fossil fuels but whether it can lead to carbon neutrality “is often questionable”, Jens Guenther, from Germany’s
Federal Environment Agency, said.
This is particularly the case when it comes to the use of “socalled cultivated biomass like maize, sugar cane and sugar beet,” he said.
Janine Korduan, from environmental NGO BUND, pointed out that industrial agriculture generates “CO2 and methane emissions through land conversion and the production of fertilisers and pesticides”, and also leads to “major losses of biodiversity and high water consumption”.
Nevertheless, Mr. Guenther said the use of plant matter in production processes would likely produce significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions than using fossil fuels, although opting for waste materials rather than crops produced in largescale farming would be preferable.
Several barriers
However, there are many barriers to taking such projects further. These range from the availability of the necessary organic matter, which is in great demand as the green transition gathers pace, to higher costs when compared to producing such chemicals with oil.
Scaling up the process will only be justified if it leads to “significant CO2 savings” in the manufacturing process, said Thorsten Dreier, a member of Covestro’s management board who is overseeing the technology.
There will also need to be proof that money “can be made in a competitive environment, in order to finance research here”, he said. And for Germany, a major challenge will be persuading manufacturers to set up costly new sites for processing chemicals.
The energyintensive chemicals sector in Europe’s top economy has been facing a crisis since Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine curtailed cheap Russian gas imports, sending power costs soaring.