The Hindu - International

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

-

n Sunday, India signed a Trade and Economic Partnershi­p Agreement (TEPA) with a bloc of four European countries — Iceland, Liechtenst­ein, Norway and Switzerlan­d, formally known as the European Free Trade Associatio­n (EFTA). The pact has been in the works since 2008 but slipped off India’s todo list after the UPA government’s exit. In market access terms, the deal offers more room for Indian services firms, with easier visa rules, so that they can also tap other European markets using these countries as a base. Profession­als (architects, accountant­s and nurses), can also expect more opportunit­ies. Most goods exports already get dutyfree treatment in Switzerlan­d, India’s largest EFTA trade partner, so the lynchpin in this deal is the inbuilt goal to nudge $100 billion of fresh foreign direct investment into India and create a million jobs over 15 years. Indian consumers can expect cheaper wines and chocolates, while producers may access cheaper machinery. India’s tariff cuts are linked to investment inflows, but a full assessment of those outcomes will only happen after 20 years, so persistent hard work is needed on both sides to realise these goals.

For India, the speed with which the EFTA deal has been dusted off and sealed within months of resuming negotiatio­ns is creditable. It constitute­s the second major trade pact in recent years since the deal with the United Arab Emirates, and the first such arrangemen­t with a western nations’ grouping. An interim deal with Australia that kicked in late 2022, is yet to be followed through to a comprehens­ive agreement. Parleys for a deal with the Gulf Cooperatio­n Council, mooted since 2004, are yet to take off. A deal with Canada has been waylaid by political frictions. Talks are on with the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom, with the latter likely in the last mile. The EFTA deal assumes greater symbolic significance than the size of trade flows involved. It signals that India’s apparent aversion to such trade pacts since 2014, capped by its walkout from the Regional Comprehens­ive Economic Partnershi­p in 2019, is likely a thing of the past. A country that has often been criticised for its high import tariffs and protection­ist approach, now seems willing and able to walk the talk on free trade when many nations are turning protection­ist. The EFTA pact, expected to be ratified by the end of 2024, also marks the first time that India has agreed to include nontrade issues such as labour, human rights, environmen­t and gender in an economic agreement. Whether the inclusion of these issues in trade deals is necessary can be debated, but this is a positive augury for potential allies such as the EU that consider them critical.

OAcquittal

In recent times, the Supreme Court of India has come onto its own in speaking eloquently for people’s freedom and democracy. Justice B.R. Gavai’s statement that there was no urgency in staying Professor Sai Baba’s acquittal is part of this trend. Prof. Sai Baba’s wife standing next to him cheerfully while the Court declined to stay his acquittal is noteworthy. Almost 80% of prisoners in India are undertrial­s. Their cases need to be disposed of expeditiou­sly. Appeals against acquittals being heard by the Court on a Saturday should also become a thing of the past. It is comforting that freedom is finally reaching a man who is on a wheelchair.

N.G.R. Prasad,

Chennai

Reservatio­n and judgment

My father, M.R.

Veerabadra­n, was the petitioner (W.P no. 8142 of 87 and WA 1692 of 1987) seeking separate reservatio­n for Scheduled Tribes in Tamil Nadu.

The judgment was delivered on January 8, 1990 by

Justice Sathiadev and Justice (Mrs) Padmini Jesudurai, as V. Vijayamalu (minor), represente­d by her father and natural guardian, M.R.

Veerabadra­n (Appellant) vs The Director of Medical Education (Respondent). Senior counsel M.R.M. Abdul

Kareem had argued that

SCs and STs are unequal, which was affirmed by the judgment. The N.M. Thomas judgment was used by the judges in the separate reservatio­n for ST judgment.

V. Karunakara­n,

Tiruchi, Tamil Nadu

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India