Pressure builds for charge on global shipping’s CO2 emissions
The European Union, Canada, Japan and climatevulnerable Pacific Island states are among 47 countries rallying support for a charge on the international shipping sector’s greenhouse gas emissions, documents reviewed by Reuters showed.
The documents, being discussed at an International Maritime Organization (IMO) meeting now entering a second week, outline four proposals with a combined 47 backers for imposing a fee on each tonne of greenhouse gas the industry produces.
Support for the idea has more than doubled from the 20 nations that publicly supported a carbon levy at a French climate finance summit last year.
Backers argue the policy could raise more than $80 billion a year in funding which could be reinvested to develop lowcarbon shipping fuels and support poorer countries to transition. Opponents, including China and Brazil, say it would penalise tradereliant emerging economies.
Those countries are competing to win over the dozens of others—including most African nations— that diplomats say have yet to take a firm stance on the issue. The IMO takes decisions by consensus, but can also do so by majority support.
The U.N. agency last year agreed to target a 20% emissions cut by 2030, and net zero emissions around 2050. While countries agreed in talks last week to continue negotiations on the emissions price, an official meeting summary noted they were “split on several issues” regarding the idea.
Albon Ishoda, IMO delegate for the lowlying Marshall Islands, said a levy was the only credible route to meet the IMO’s goals.
“If this does not get passed, what are the alternatives? Because we’ve already agreed to certain targets,” he said. “Are we going back to the drawing board?”
Shipping, which transports around 90% of world trade, accounts for nearly 3% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions—a share expected to expand in the coming decades without tougher antipollution measures.
A proposal tabled by the Marshall Islands, Vanuatu and others—which despite their high reliance on shipping have demanded an emissions levy for years— proposes a charge of $150 per tonne of CO2.
Researchers have said a $150 carbon price could make investments in lowcarbon ammoniafuelled systems economic compared ships. with conventional
Disagreement
China, Brazil and Argentina pushed back on the idea of a CO2 levy in IMO talks last year. A study by Brazil’s University of Sao Paulo found a carbon tax on shipping would cut GDP across developing countries by 0.13%, with Africa and South America among the hardesthit regions.
A Brazilian negotiator said Brazil and other developing countries were seeking a swift energy transition with the least disruptive effects on their economies, especially for countries that rely on seaborne trade.
A proposal by Argentina, Brazil, China, and others advocates a global fuel emissions intensity limit, with a financial penalty for breaches, as an alternative. That would mean if countries fully complied with the fuel standard, no emissions would face the fee.
“We will not be in favour of a flat levy likely to hurt developing countries, but we would be in favour of a good levy only applied to the emissions over a certain benchmark,” the Brazilian negotiator said.
Despite differences of opinion, member states are still attempting to agree on global measures to avoid more countries targeting the industry on a national level.
That would fragment the market with varying local standards, and cause a headache for companies shipping goods globally.