The Hindu - International

CCI rejects pleas against Google Play Store’s billing policy

-

Fair trade regulator Competitio­n Commission of India (CCI) on Wednesday dismissed four petitions of Indian app companies filed against Google’s new Play Store billing policy to levy an 11% to 26% charge on inapp payments.

Indianorig­in app firms alleged that Google’s Play Store payment policies are anticompet­itive. However, the CCI made clear that nothing stated in this order shall be tantamount to a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case, and the Director General will conduct the investigat­ion without being swayed in any manner whatsoever by the observatio­ns made herein.

“The commission is of the view that the informants have failed to meet the necessary criteria for grant of interim relief as propounded by the Supreme Court... The informants have not been able to project any higher level of prima facie case warranting a positive direction as sought by the informants at the interim stage,” the CCI said in its order.

The complainan­ts were Anupam Mittal’s People Interactiv­e India Pvt Ltd., Mebigo Labs, the Indian Broadcasti­ng and Digital Foundation , and the Indian Digital Media Industry Foundation.

The petitions were asking the regulator to restrain Google from collecting any fee for transactio­ns involving paid downloads or inapp purchases on apps offering digital products or services.

The order came after the CCI, on March 15, ordered a probe against Google for alleged discrimina­tory practices with respect to its Play Store pricing policy after finding a prima facie violation of the competitio­n law.

The order for detailed investigat­ion comes less than two years after CCI penalised and passed various directions against Google regarding Play Store policies.

While there may be concerns about the fairness of Google’s fee structure as outlined by the regulator in its prima facie order dated March 15, it is essential to recognise the costs and responsibi­lities associated with maintainin­g and operating app stores, CCI noted.

In its order, the regulator stated, “Informants have not been able to demonstrat­e a case in their favour for grant of interim relief for complete restraint on Google from the collection of its fee”. CCI also said that no case whatsoever has been made out by the informants, which warrants a grant of interim relief. Accordingl­y, the applicatio­ns stand dismissed.

High commission

Indian apps representa­tive body Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF) said it is concerned about the high commission imposed during inapp purchases that are not in the best interest of our nation’s digital entreprene­urs.

“These ratesare significantly higher. The rates should be reconsider­ed and mutually favourable to both. This model will support the growth and sustainabi­lity of India’s digital economy. We trust the judicial process and await further hearings with the hope that the best interests of the Indian app developmen­t community will be prioritise­d by the Indian judiciary,” ADIF Associate Director Prateek Jain said.

The regulator’s decision came on a raft of complaints that Google’s updated payment policies in relation to its proprietar­y app store — Google Play Store — which is alleged to be in violation of the competitio­n law.

The order also comes after Google removed some apps from the Play Store over payment issues and later reinstated them.

 ?? REUTERS ?? The petitions were filed against Google’s new Play Store billing policy to levy an 11% to 26% charge on in-app payments.
REUTERS The petitions were filed against Google’s new Play Store billing policy to levy an 11% to 26% charge on in-app payments.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India