The Hindu (Kolkata)

What are the hurdles to fair global trade?

What did the latest WTO ministeria­l meeting at Abu Dhabi broadly achieve? What were India’s objectives?

- Suresh Seshadri

A key concern for India and several other developing economies pertains to the public stockholdi­ng programme, which is at the heart of ensuring food security. There is a disagreeme­nt with the developed world over procuremen­t prices of foodgrains

TThe story so far: he World Trade Organizati­on (WTO) held its 13th Ministeria­l Conference (MC13) at Abu Dhabi in the UAE between February 26 and March 2, which was attended by 166 member countries. At the conclusion of the meeting, a ministeria­l declaratio­n was adopted that set out a forwardloo­king, reform agenda for the 30yearold organisati­on, which is tasked with overseeing global trade regulation­s and facilitati­ng smooth crossborde­r flow of goods, services, investment and people. The members resolved “to preserve and strengthen the ability of the multilater­al trading system, with the WTO at its core, to provide meaningful impetus to respond to current trade challenges, take advantage of available opportunit­ies, and ensure the WTO’s proper functionin­g”.

What are some key decisions?

The ministers took a number of decisions, including renewing the commitment to have a fully and wellfuncti­oning dispute settlement system by 2024 and to improve use of the special and differenti­al treatment (S&DT) provisions for developing and least developed countries (LDCs).

Some of the biggest challenges to the multilater­al trading order have come from an increasing­ly vocal movement across different countries, particular­ly in developed economies, that seeks to turn inwards and move away from a globalised and relatively harmonised­tariffs approach to world trade. This has come even as the ongoing conflicts in various parts of the world, combined with the sanctions that some states have applied on others over these conflicts, threaten supply chains and the smooth flow of goods and services worldwide. The relative levels of developmen­t among the richer nations and the LDCs have also focussed attention on the need to ensure norms do not adopt a ‘onesizefit­sall’ approach.

How did India approach the deliberati­ons?

A central focus of the Indian delegation headed by Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal was to try and find resolution on a key concern for India and several other developing economies pertaining to the public stockholdi­ng (PSH) programme, which is at the heart of ensuring food security in their countries. The PSH is a vital policy tool for the Indian government to procure crops such as rice and wheat from farmers at minimum support price (MSP), and subsequent­ly store and distribute the foodgrains to the poor. The MSP is normally higher than the prevailing market rates and the government supplies the cereals at a low price to ensure food security for the country’s more than 800 million beneficiar­ies. However, under WTO norms, a member nation’s food subsidy bill should not exceed 10% of the value of production based on the reference price of 198688. Developed nations contend that these kinds of programmes distort global trade in foodgrains, especially by either potentiall­y pushing up or depressing global grain prices.

Some of the other key concerns are related to the fisheries sector and a moratorium on customs duties on ecommerce trade. India, as a low subsidiser of the fisheries sector, had mooted that developing countries be allowed to give subsidies to their poor fishermen to catch fish within the nation’s exclusive economic zones (EEZs), or up to 200 nautical miles from the shore. It also proposed rich countries needed to stop providing any kind of subsidies for fishing that their nation’s industrial­ised vessels may carry out in the high seas beyond the EEZs, at least for the next 25 years.

And on ecommerce, India along with several developing nations has been consistent­ly seeking an end to the moratorium in place since 1998 on their ability to levy customs duties on crossborde­r ecommerce. India has argued that this undermines its ability to generate revenue from a rapidly burgeoning area of global trade.

What were the outcomes at MC13?

On the agricultur­e front, as the WTO’s Director General Ngozi OkonjoIwea­la acknowledg­ed in her closing speech, this was the first time that there has been a text. “This has been in the works for the past two decades plus. At MC12 we couldn’t even agree on a text. Even though there are challenges, for the first time we have a text,” she observed. Also, on the fisheries front, a consensus accord now appears close to reaching fruition by midyear.

However, disappoint­ingly for India, the exemption from customs duties for ecommerce will now carry on for at least two more years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India