Turning the spotlight on the urban poor
he India Employment Report (IER) 2024 by the Institute for Human Development and International Labour Organization poses questions on the trickledown effect of benefits to the working class in the backdrop of a 5.4% average real economic growth, from 201516 to 202223. It also shows a divergent trend between rural and urban areas in terms of employment and income. It demonstrates a relatively higher unemployment rate in urban areas, at 4.8% in 2000 over the 1.5% in rural areas. However, average monthly earnings are higher by 76% for selfemployed, 44% for regular employed and 22% for casual labour in urban areas in 2022. The coexistence of higher unemployment and wages requires further investigation to understand its implications for the urban poor. This article looks at the dynamics of employment and wages in pockets of deep urban poverty, such as slums, and juxtaposes these with the findings of the IER 2024.
The higher income in urban areas and a better life have prompted ruralurban migration in the past. As in the IER 2024, although overall migration has increased, the migration of males has declined by 1.2% during 200008, and further marginally in 2021. This implies that migration for economic mobility is losing its sheen. Rural poor households migrate to slums instead of formal settlements. Hence, an analysis of income and employment trends of slum dwellers would reveal the prospects of economic mobility and decent work for the poor in urban India.
TFindings of survey in Kolkata
This writer and a team conducted a survey in 37 slums across different parts of Kolkata in 2012. These slums were again surveyed in 202223. However, we could track only 29 slums as the other slums had either been redeveloped or evicted. We surveyed 513 slum households in 2012 and 396 in 202122. To get the overall trends from 2012, we collected data on income and employment in slums in 2019, the preCOVID19 year, to avoid the COVID19affected years of 201922, for comparison.
The major occupations in slums in Kolkata have remained the same over the decade, with a fourth of the working population taking on unskilled labour. It is the most stable and significant occupation in slums. The IER 2024 also finds that a fourth of workers in India were engaged in unskilled work during this period. Other major occupations in slums were skilled or semiskilled labour work, and people as employees in private organisations, and owning petty businesses or small shops. Unlike unskilled labour, the share of employment in skilled and semiskilled labour was reduced by 6%, and in private organisations by 3% between 201219.
On the other hand, employment has increased by 9% in petty businesses or small shops. Surprisingly, the share of other selfemployed has also declined by 3%. Among occupations that were less popular earlier but which gained momentum in the last 10 years are truck driving and cleaning, by 5%, and construction and related work, by 4%. The people employed in construction and relatedwork were minuscule in 2012.
Income trends
The average monthly income in 2012 was around ₹4,900. It decreased by 5% at constant prices (2012) in 2019. Income was the highest for government employees in the slums in both periods. However, at constant prices in 2012, their monthly income decreased by 5% in 2019. On the other hand, the monthly income of domestic servants and unskilled workers has remained the lowest. The highest decline in real income is observed for construction and related work (51%), followed by petty business or small shop (32%) and government service (32%) in 2019 as compared to 2012.
The decline in income and the rise in engagement with petty business or small shops and construction or related work indicates a need for gainful employment options. Medium to large shop owners have also lost real income by 26%. The popularity of labour work can be explained by the rise in the real income of unskilled labour by 33%. Income of skilled or semiskilled labour increased by 12% but a lesser proportion are employed in 2019 compared to 2012. It implies the reduction of the availability of skilled or semiskilled labour work.
The IER 2024 illustrates similar trends of changes in employment and wages. The share of selfemployed (including business) has increased from 38.7% to 41.3% for males and from 34.5% to 44.8% for females in urban areas between 200019. However, real monthly wages (at 2012 prices) declined for selfemployed from ₹7,017 to ₹6,843 and for regular workers from ₹12,100 to ₹11,155 but increased for casual workers (including labour) from ₹3,701 to ₹4,364 between 201219. This implies that the economic transition observed by the IER 2024 is a reflection of the transformation happening in urban slums.
Interestingly, the fall in slum income of the highest income earners, government servants, is accompanied by a doubling of the real income of the lowest income earners, domestic servants. This implies that there was a general downfall in income, along with a reduction in the differences in income from 201219. Other statistical measures also show a fall in inequality in slums.
The gender composition within different occupation categories in Kolkata shows that overall, the percentage of women in the workforce has declined by 3% in 202122 compared to 2012. However, the IER 2024 shows a 1.6% increase in women’s workforce participation during 2012 and 2022. This may be due to an increase in female workforce participation in nonslum areas rather than in slum areas.
Rise in casual work
A comparison of the IER 2024 and our survey data shows that the rise of casual work, especially labour work, has happened due to increasing wages. However, casual work offers a substandard work condition without any social security. On the contrary, selfemployment such as businesses, is rising but without a commensurate rise in income. It projects a groundswell of lowearning petty businesspeople in slums. Slum women could not march with the overall rising trends of female workforce participation in urban areas. With the reduction of inequality, income also fell leading the urban poor to deeper poverty. Hence, the higher income in urban areas compared to rural India does not delineate the urban poor’s economic mobility and quality of work. Hence, more public support is required in urban areas for access to cheap food and gainful employment. It also explains the declining male migration during 200008. As the Gross Value Added in agriculture, forestry and fishing grew at the slowest rate (3.03%) compared to other sectors during 200019, along with a negative employment growth (1.05%), focusing more on rural nonfarm would be imperative.
An analysis of income and employment trends of slum dwellers points to the prospects of economic mobility and decent work for the poor in urban India