Prabir Purkayastha on why social control of major scienti c and technological transitions is imperative so that technology serves the public good
Leo Tolstoy’s quip, “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way,” is frequently cited by the literati. Prachi Gupta, a 30-something Indian American writer, nods to this. Raised with a doctor father, a tender mother and a gifted brother in a quintessentially suburban life, Gupta unveils what really goes on behind closed doors, be it mental health a©ictions, verbal and physical abuse; all with the possibility of looming — though unexpected — deaths making an appearance.
Her memoir, They Called Us Exceptional and Other Lies That Raised Us, was based on an essay she wrote in 2019, and her struggle to make sense of the death of her brother, with whom she shared an on-and-o£ companionship. The expansion into a book includes a wider lens of her upbringing in America and emergence into young adulthood — including romantic relationships, career changes, family dynamics — with further analysis. Edited excerpts from an interview.
How do we look at science and technology? What role do they play in society, and, equally important, what is society’s role in developing science and technology?” Prabir Purkayastha has set down his thinking through his decades as an engineer, social/political activist, as a part of the people’s science movement, and of the free software movement. Few engineers and technologists have written about the nature of their discipline, he says, maybe because while scientists of an earlier era were taught philosophy (“At least Einstein’s generation of scientists were”), engineers came from trade schools, and worked with their hands. This book is his contribution to the dearth in the literature.
Knowledge as Commons: Towards Inclusive Science and Technology builds on certain core ideas. Here’s some of them: while science and technology draw each on the other, the objective of science is to know nature; that of technology to build artefacts and so change nature. To build something in the real world, technologists need to bridge the gap between what is known and what is not. Increasingly, science needs artefacts in order to understand nature: illustratively, the Hadron Collider.
‘Runaway technology’ Science and technology are part of a triad, along with society. Technology’s choices are social choices, and cannot be left to a technocratic elite. It is why we need a people’s science movement, demystifying science and technology choices. Social control of major scientic and technological transitions is imperative so that technology serves the public good and is kept away from doing harm. The destructive potential that has been unspooling since the industrial revolution, as also modern warfare, has brought us to the precipice, where runaway technology — and he invokes nuclear weapons, climate change from greenhouse gases, biological weapons — could “destroy the world as we know it.” Maybe this would have sounded hyperbolic a few decades ago. Not today, when there is a serious knocking together of heads to consider if the Holocene epoch — which was marked by human occupation of the earth — had to give way to the Anthropocene, signifying human impact on the planet: a euphemistic way to speak of the destruction humans have demonstrated the ability to cause. For the moment, the geologists have shelved the idea, but that this is even being seriously considered should give us pause.
‘The commons movement’ Scientic and technical knowledge is “universal labour”; the ‘commons movement’ in science is not only about the reproduction of the rights to knowledge, but also on how science is to be produced, as an open and collaborative exercise. The idea of the commons meets the force of corporate self-interest, and what we have is a patenting regime that supports private appropriation on a grand scale, of both “biological and knowledge resources held in common by society.” This now extends, for instance, to patenting of life forms, genetic resources, genetic information in life sciences. This property regime in knowledge should seem incredible, but it has merely got normalised through repetition.
Evoking a sense of foreboding, he speaks of the HIV/AIDS epidemic where what stood between life and death (literally) was Big Pharma’s prot. And, as he says, and we saw, COVID showed that this was not an isolated instance. Then there is Nexavar, a cancer drug that Bayer had priced at $65,000 for a course for a year. Addressing it as “theft”, this is what the CEO of Bayer said when India made it accessible
Knowledge as Commons: Towards Inclusive Science and Technology
Prabir Purkayastha
LeftWord
395 seems to haunt the book.
A: I think most of us know what it’s like to love someone deeply who also hurts us deeply. I wanted to show how this push-pull dynamic unfolds, how it feels, and the choices it forces us to make. When we send children or partners the message that they must sacrice themselves to keep the peace for the sake of the family unit, we are actually enabling pain and dysfunction that caused the initial rupture, and deepening our sense of isolation.
Q: Much of your relationship with by bringing it within a compulsory licence: “We did not develop this medicine for Indians... we developed it for Western patients who can a£ord it.”
The battle over the commons is also a battle of ideology or ideas. He would have us revisit Hardin’s ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ to see how, essentially, it was an ideological attack on the commons.
In a juxtaposition of two ways of thinking, he cites the Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom when she speaks of the irony that the innite commons of knowledge are treated as if they were nite, while the nite commons of air and ocean are treated as if they were innite.
India’s scientic advances
In exasperation at political personages making claims about science in ancient India, he produces an interesting chapter on the actual advances India made in medicine, surgery and mathematics. He debunks the western claims to being the progenitor of ideas scientic, as he does of the ‘white man’s your father appears to be an environment of consistent instability. How did you cope? A: From a very young age, I kept a journal and I immersed myself in art. Art gave me a sense of purpose at a very early age. I felt there was something vital to creating.
My dad gave me every tool to succeed in the world. But as I grew up and tried to t the mould of the daughter I thought he wanted, my creativity dried up. I stopped drawing and writing. I graduated college, went into management consulting, got engaged to a doctor. I was conventionally successful. But I realised that I was miserable, and I saw that
They Called Us Exceptional and Other Lies That Raised Us Prachi Gupta
Penguin Random House 550 (Kindle) burden’ while exploring the history of India’s development of the modern number system and zero.
Purkayastha makes no secret of being a Marxist, although it is not ideology but reasoning with science that moves from page to page. It is di¥cult not to wonder if these are what have landed him in prison. The book, though, introduces us to a mind that is intelligent and concerned about the state of science in the country. I will leave you with these extracts: “What di£erentiates a developed economy from a relatively less developed one is its scientic and technological knowledge. That is why the Netherlands is an advanced country while Saudi Arabia with a GDP of similar order is not.” And, “confusing history with fantasy also ignores the central division that caused the ossication of Indian science, the separation of the hand from the head.”
Think about it.
The reviewer is a Delhi-based law researcher. despite all that they had achieved, my brother and my father were miserable, too. They both attempted suicide within months of each other, and I was worried that I was heading down that same path. I decided that I needed to change my circumstances and go follow the impulse to create again.
Q: What has the response been like?
A: I think the most surprising thing is how many people around the world can see themselves in my family’s story. Also, my Dadaji died last winter, just months before the book was due out, and he was so excited for it. He understood that I was going to tell the full story, and he supported that decision. I drew a lot of inspiration and courage knowing that I had his support.
If you are in distress, please reach out to these 24x7 helplines: KIRAN 18005990019 or Aasra 9820466726.
The interviewer is a freelance writer and HR consultant based in Mumbai and Toronto.